...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Pediatrics >Seasonal Influenza Vaccination and the Heightened Risk of Coronavirus and Other Pandemic Virus Infections: Fact or Fiction?
【24h】

Seasonal Influenza Vaccination and the Heightened Risk of Coronavirus and Other Pandemic Virus Infections: Fact or Fiction?

机译:季节性流感疫苗接种和冠状病毒和其他大流行病毒感染的风险:事实或虚构?

获取原文
           

摘要

During this ongoing severe acute respiratory illness coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, few speculative reports on significantassociation of influenza vaccines with an increased risk ofcoronavirus infection appeared both in media and academiccircles. The speculation of vaccines paradoxically increasing therisk of infections possibly originated first following 2009influenza A (H1N1pdm09) pandemic when four Canadianstudies suggested that receipt of seasonal influenza vaccineincreased the risk of laboratory-confirmed 2009 pandemicinfluenza A (H1N1pdm09) virus infection [1]. This led to fiveadditional studies, each of which substantiated these initialfindings. One proposed mechanism behind this phenomenon is‘original antigenic sin’ which was first used to describe how firstexposure to influenza virus shapes the outcome of subsequentexposures to antigenically related strains. When an individual isinfected by an ‘evolved’ strain with a new dominant antigen,slightly different from the ‘original’ strain against which theperson has been vaccinated, the immune system producesantibodies against the ‘original’ strain through preformed high-affinity memory B cells that inhibit activation of na?ve B cellsresulting in a weak immune response against the new ‘dominant’strain. Hence, the risk of infection paradoxically increased invaccinated individuals as compared to unvaccinated individuals[2].
机译:在这种持续的严重急性呼吸疾病中冠状病毒2(SARS-COV-2)大流行,很少有关于流感疫苗的显着报告,媒体和学术渠道出现了患者风险增加的患病疫苗。当四个加拿大术后,第一次接受季节性流感疫苗(H1N1PDM09)大流行疫苗的疫苗矛盾的感染神经疫苗矛盾的疫苗这导致了Fiveadditional研究,每个研究都证实了这些初始件。这种现象背后的一个机制是“inoriginal抗原SiN”,首先用于描述以血流感病毒如何将曝光的结果形状为抗原相关菌株的结果。当通过具有新的主导抗原的“进化”菌株的单独患有的单独患有较多的“原始”菌株略有不同,免疫系统通过预先形成的高亲和力记忆B细胞抵抗“原始”菌株的影响抑制对新的“占优势的”的弱免疫应答的Na'Ve B细胞的活化。因此,与未接受的个体相比,感染矛盾的侵袭局部侵入性的危害性的风险[2]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号