首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Elusive search for effective provider interventions: a systematic review of provider interventions to increase adherence to evidence-based treatment for depression
【24h】

Elusive search for effective provider interventions: a systematic review of provider interventions to increase adherence to evidence-based treatment for depression

机译:难以捉摸地搜索有效的提供商干预:对提供者干预的系统审查,以增加对抑郁症的循证治疗的依从性

获取原文
       

摘要

Depression is a common mental health disorder for which clinical practice guidelines have been developed. Prior systematic reviews have identified complex organizational interventions, such as collaborative care, as effective for guideline implementation; yet, many healthcare delivery organizations are interested in less resource-intensive methods to increase provider adherence to guidelines and guideline-concordant practices. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of healthcare provider interventions that aim to increase adherence to evidence-based treatment of depression in routine clinical practice. We searched five databases through August 2017 using a comprehensive search strategy to identify English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the quality improvement, implementation science, and behavior change literature that evaluated outpatient provider interventions, in the absence of practice redesign efforts, to increase adherence to treatment guidelines or guideline-concordant practices for depression. We used meta-analysis to summarize odds ratios, standardized mean differences, and incidence rate ratios, and assessed quality of evidence (QoE) using the GRADE approach. Twenty-two RCTs promoting adherence to clinical practice guidelines or guideline-concordant practices met inclusion criteria. Studies evaluated diverse provider interventions, including distributing guidelines to providers, education/training such as academic detailing, and combinations of education with other components such as targeting implementation barriers. Results were heterogeneous and analyses comparing provider interventions with usual clinical practice did not indicate a statistically significant difference in guideline adherence across studies. There was some evidence that provider interventions improved individual outcomes such as medication prescribing and indirect comparisons indicated more complex provider interventions may be associated with more favorable outcomes. We did not identify types of provider interventions that were consistently associated with improvements across indicators of adherence and across studies. Effects on patients' health in these RCTs were inconsistent across studies and outcomes. Existing RCTs describe a range of provider interventions to increase adherence to depression guidelines. Low QoE and lack of replication of specific intervention strategies across studies limited conclusions that can be drawn from the existing research. Continued efforts are needed to identify successful strategies to maximize the impact of provider interventions on increasing adherence to evidence-based treatment for depression. PROSPERO record CRD42017060460 on 3/29/17.
机译:抑郁症是一种常见的心理健康障碍,已经开发了临床实践指导方针。先前系统的评论已确定复杂的组织干预措施,例如合作护理,以及指导意见的有效;然而,许多医疗保健送货组织对更少的资源密集型方法感兴趣,以提高提供商遵守指南和指导协调措施。该系统审查的目的是评估医疗保健提供者干预的有效性,该干预措施旨在增加依据循序体临床实践中抑郁症的依据依据。我们在2017年8月在综合搜索策略中搜索了五个数据库,以识别评估门诊提供商干预的质量改进,实施科学和行为变更文献中的英语随机对照试验(RCT),在没有实践重新设计的努力的情况下增加遵守治疗指南或指南 - 抑郁症的协调措施。我们使用META分析来总结差异比率,标准化的平均差异和发病率比,并使用等级方法评估证据质量(QoE)。二十二次RCT促进遵守临床实践指南或指南 - 协调一致的措施符合纳入标准。研究评估了各种提供商干预措施,包括向提供商,教育/培训等方面的指导,以及其他组成部分的教育组合,如针对实施障碍。结果是异质的,并分析与通常的临床实践的提供者干预措施并未表明跨研究的指南依从性差异。有一些证据表明提供者干预改善了个性化结果,如药物处方和间接比较表明更多复杂的提供者干预可能与更有利的结果相关。我们没有确定与遵守指标和跨研究的改进相关的提供者干预类型。对这些RCT的患者健康的影响跨研究和结果不一致。现有的RCT描述了一系列提供者干预,以增加抑制抑郁指南的依从性。低QoE和缺乏对研究的具体干预策略的复制有限的结论,可以从现有的研究中汲取。需要持续的努力来确定成功的策略,以最大限度地提高提供者干预措施对增加依据抑郁症的依据依据的依从性的影响。 Prospero于3/29/17创下CRD42017060460。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号