首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Longitudinal evaluation of a course to build core competencies in implementation practice
【24h】

Longitudinal evaluation of a course to build core competencies in implementation practice

机译:纵向评估课程,以建立实施实践中的核心竞争力

获取原文
       

摘要

Few training opportunities are available for implementation practitioners; we designed the Practicing Knowledge Translation (PKT) to address this gap. The goal of PKT is to train practitioners to use evidence and apply implementation science in healthcare settings. The aim of this study was to describe PKT and evaluate participant use of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs), knowledge, self-efficacy, and satisfaction and feedback on the course. PKT was delivered to implementation practitioners between September 2015 and February 2016 through a 3-day workshop, 11 webinars. We assessed PKT using an uncontrolled before and after study design, using convergent parallel mixed methods. The primary outcome was use of TMFs in implementation projects. Secondary outcomes were knowledge and self-efficacy across six core competencies, factors related to each of the outcomes, and satisfaction with the course. Participants completed online surveys and semi-structured interviews at baseline, 3, 6, and 12?months. Participants (n?=?15) reported an increase in their use of implementation TMFs (mean?=?2.11; estimate?=?2.11; standard error (SE)?=?0.4; p?=?0.03). There was a significant increase in participants' knowledge of developing an evidence-informed, theory-driven program (ETP) (estimate?=?4.10; SE?=?0.37; p?=?0.002); evidence implementation (estimate?=?2.68; SE?=?0.42; p??0.001); evaluation (estimate?=?4.43; SE?=?0.36; p??0.001); sustainability, scale, and spread (estimate?=?2.55; SE?=?0.34; p??0.001); and context assessment (estimate?=?3.86; SE?=?0.32; p??0.001). There was a significant increase in participants' self-efficacy in developing an ETP (estimate?=?3.81; SE?=?0.34; p??0.001); implementation (estimate?=?3.01; SE?=?0.36; p??0.001); evaluation (estimate?=?3.83; SE?=?0.39; p?=?0.002); sustainability, scale, and spread (estimate?=?3.06; SE?=?0.46; p?=?0.003); and context assessment (estimate?=?4.05; SE?=?0.38; p?=?0.016). Process and outcome measures collected indicated that PKT participants increased use of, knowledge of, self-efficacy in KT. Our findings highlight the importance of longitudinal evaluations of training initiatives to inform how to build capacity for implementers.
机译:少数培训机会可用于实施从业者;我们设计了练习知识翻译(PKT)来解决这一差距。 PKT的目标是训练从业者使用证据并在医疗保健环境中应用实施科学。本研究的目的是描述PKT并评估参与者使用实施科学理论,模型和框架(TMFS),知识,自我效力,以及对课程的满意度和反馈。 PKT于2015年9月至2016年2月至2016年2月至2016年2月,通过三天的研讨会提供了普及的实施从业者。我们使用收敛并联混合方法使用学习设计前后的不受控制和之后评估PKT。主要结果是在实施项目中使用TMF。二次结果是六个核心竞争力的知识和自我效能,与每个结果相关的因素,以及与课程的满意度。参与者在基线,3,6和12个月内完成在线调查和半结构化访谈?几个月。参与者(n?=?15)报告其使用实施TMFS的使用增加(平均值?=?2.11;估计?=?2.12;标准误差(SE)?=?0.4; p?= 0.03)。参与者开发证据知识驱动的计划(ETP)的知识有显着增加(估计?=?4.10; SE?= 0.37; P?= 0.002);证据实施(估计?=?2.68; SE?= 0.42; P?<?0.001);评价(估计?=?4.43; SE?= 0.36; p?<0.001);可持续性,规模和传播(估计?=?2.55; SE?= 0.34; P?<0.001);和上下文评估(估计?=?3.86; SE?= 0.32; p?<0.001)。参与者在开发ETP方面有显着增加(估计?= 3.81; SE?= 0.34; P?<0.001);实施(估计?= 3.01; SE?= 0.36; p?<0.001);评价(估计?=?3.83; SE?=?0.39; p?= 0.002);可持续性,规模和传播(估计?= 3.06; SE?=?0.46; p?= 0.003);和上下文评估(估计?=?4.05; se?=?0.38; p?=?0.016)。收集的过程和结果措施表明,PKT参与者增加了kt中的自我效能知识的使用。我们的调查结果突出了纵向评估培训举措的重要性,以告知如何为实施者建立能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号