首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Preferences for peer-reviewed versus other publication sources: a survey of general dentists in the National Dental PBRN
【24h】

Preferences for peer-reviewed versus other publication sources: a survey of general dentists in the National Dental PBRN

机译:对同行评审的偏好与其他出版物来源:国家牙科PBRN中一般牙医调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Medical professionals have access to a broad range of resources to address clinical information needs. While much attention is given to new sources of data such as those available on the internet, it is less clear how clinicians choose between peer-reviewed research literature and other publication-based sources. This analysis distinguishes between possible drivers of publication type preference (namely, practice setting, advanced training, professional development experiences). Dentists enrolled in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) are the population for this study. Theories of human and intellectual capital and institutional logics theory are used to understand how advanced training and other clinical experiences may explain the choices that dentists make when faced with clinical questions. An online questionnaire was implemented with general dentists in the US National Dental PBRN. A series of logistic and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models were used to explain the use of peer-reviewed and other publications. Measures of knowledge-based human capital distinctions (advanced clinical training and research engagement, advanced professional status, personal motivation for professional advancement) were used to explain preferences for research literature as a clinical resource. General dentists with advanced training, as well as those with a skill advancement motivation, show a preference for peer-reviewed materials. General dentists who have been practicing longer tend to favor other dental publications, preferring those sources as a resource when faced with?clinical challenges. Human capital and professional motivation distinguish the information preferences among general dentists. Further, these factors explain more variance in use of peer-reviewed materials than practice setting does. Few differences by demographic groups were evident. Results point to a distinct variation in the general dentistry professional community. Advanced training among general dentists, as well as the types of procedures typically conducted in their practice, distinguishes their information preferences from other general dentists, including those with more years of clinical experience.
机译:医疗专业人员可以获得广泛的资源来满足临床信息需求。虽然诸如互联网上可用的新数据来源的许多关注,但临床医生在同行评审的研究文献和其他基于出版的来源之间选择的清晰度不太清楚。这种分析区分了出版物类型偏好的可能驱动程序(即练习设置,高级培训,专业开发经验)。牙医参加了国家牙科实践的研究网络(PBRN)是这项研究的人口。人类和智力资本和制度逻辑理论的理论用于了解先进的培训和其他临床经验如何解释牙医在面临临床问题时所做的选择。在美国国家牙科PBRN的一般牙医实施了一位在线问卷。使用一系列逻辑和普通最小二乘(OLS)回归模型来解释使用同行评审和其他出版物的使用。基于知识的人力资本区别措施(先进的临床培训和研究参与,先进的专业地位,专业进步的个人动机)用于解释研究文献作为临床资源的偏好。一般牙医具有先进的培训,以及具有技能进步动机的牙医,表现出对同伴审查的材料的偏好。一般牙医一直练习的牙医往往有利于其他牙科出版物,更喜欢这些来源作为资源,当面临?临床挑战。人力资本和专业动机区分一般牙医之间的信息偏好。此外,这些因素解释了使用比实践设置使用的对等审查材料的更方差。人口统计群的差异很明显。结果指出了一般牙科专业社区的不同变化。一般牙医之间的高级培训,以及通常在实践中进行的程序类型,将其信息偏好与其他一般牙医的信息区分开来,包括多年临床经验的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号