...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytical Sciences >Comparative Measurement of Gas Temperature in a Graphite Atomizer by a Two-line Method of Iron and Nickel Spectral Lines in Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
【24h】

Comparative Measurement of Gas Temperature in a Graphite Atomizer by a Two-line Method of Iron and Nickel Spectral Lines in Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

机译:石墨炉原子吸收光谱法中铁和镍光谱线两线法测定石墨雾化器中气温的比较测量

获取原文
           

摘要

The gas temperature of atomospheric gas in a graphite atomizer was measured during an atomization stage in graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GF-AAS), by using a two-line method under the assumption of Boltzmann distribution. Iron and nickel were chosen as the probe elements to compare the gas temperatures obtained with different pairs of spectral lines. The atomic absorptions of two iron atomic lines and those of two nickel atomic lines were simultaneously monitored to obtain their absorbances for the temperature determination. Their gas temperatures were lower than the wall temperature which was monitored by the conventional temperature control for GF-AAS. Furthermore, the temporal variations at the atomizing stage were different between the iron lines and the nickel lines: the maximum peak of the nickel gas temperature appeared to be more delayed and broadly than that of the iron gas temperature. This result could be attributed to the fact that nickel species began to be atomized a little behind iron species, probably because it was more difficult to reduce nickel oxide with graphite carbon than an iron oxide when these oxide species would be formed at the charring stage. A graphite furnace varies the temperature during the atomizing-duration time and also the distribution becomes inhomogeneous at different portions; therefore, the gas temperature would provide overall information along the optical path of incident radiation, when the probe elements diffuse in the furnace. The two-line method enables variations not only in the gas temperature but in the atomizing of probe elements to be directly determined, due to the ability of remote sensing and rapid response.
机译:在石墨炉原子吸收光谱法(GF-AAS)中的雾化阶段期间测量石墨雾化器中的无制气体气体的气体温度通过使用双线法在Boltzmann分布的假设下。选择铁和镍作为探针元件,以比较用不同对光谱线获得的气体温度。同时监测两条铁原子系和两条镍原子系的原子吸收,得到它们的温度测定吸烟。它们的气体温度低于由GF-AAS的常规温度控制监测的壁温度。此外,雾化阶段的时间变化在铁管线和镍线之间是不同的:镍气温度的最大峰值似乎比铁气温的最大峰值似乎更延迟并且宽。该结果可能归因于镍种在铁物种后面开始雾化的事实,可能是因为当这些氧化物物种在炭化阶段形成时,更难以将氧化镍与石墨碳的氧化物减少。石墨炉在雾化期间变化温度,并且分布在不同部分时也变得不均匀;因此,当探针元件在炉中漫射时,气体温度将沿着入射辐射的光路提供整体信息。双线方法使得不仅在气体温度中的变化,而且由于遥感和快速响应的能力直接确定的探针元件的雾化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号