...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Radiation Oncology >Do Women Have Equal Chances for an Academic Career in Radiation Oncology in Canada? A Comparison With Related Specialties
【24h】

Do Women Have Equal Chances for an Academic Career in Radiation Oncology in Canada? A Comparison With Related Specialties

机译:妇女是否在加拿大辐射肿瘤学的学术职业有平等机会?与相关专业的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PurposeThe progress of women in academic medicine appears to be curtailed. We evaluated gender differences in academia for residents in radiation oncology compared with 2 of its related specialties, radiology and medical oncology, across Canada.Methods and MaterialsWe analyzed abstracts presented between 2013 and 2016 at the annual meetings of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists and compared it to the corresponding data for the meetings of the Canadian Association of Radiologists and Canadian Association of Medical Oncology. We further evaluated gender composition of abstracts, presentations, and publications available on PubMed. Conversion rates according to gender and to medical specialties were assessed. Proportions were compared using Fisher exact test or the chi-squared test.ResultsAmong the 198 presented abstracts, 103 (52%) were published. Radiation oncology had the highest publishing rate with 90% (oncology 56%, radiology 40%). The publication rate between the medical specialties was significantly different (P< .001).Fifty-seven percent of abstracts presented by women were published versus 48% of abstracts presented by men. Overall, there was no significant difference between genders in terms of subsequent conversions into a scientific publication within each specialty (P= .25-1.0).In radiation oncology, women presented 67% of abstracts and published 95% of their presented abstracts, and in medical oncology, 66% of abstracts were from women and 57% of the presented abstracts were published. Among the published abstracts, 83% had the same first author in the abstract and the publication. Among those who lost their first-authorship status, 59% were women. However, there was no statistically significant difference between specialties for loss of first-author status.ConclusionsWe observed that from 2013 to 2016, women had the highest presentation and publication rate in radiation oncology. More prospective data are needed to monitor the progress of women in all specialties and their specific needs.
机译:妇女在学术医学中的目的似乎受到缩减。我们在加拿大的其与其相关专业,放射学和医学肿瘤的2个相关专业,放射学和医学肿瘤学中的居民学术界评估了患者的性别差异。在加拿大肿瘤肿瘤学家的年度会议上分析了2013年和2016年间的摘要摘要它对加拿大放射科和加拿大医学肿瘤学协会会议的相应数据。我们进一步评估了在PubMed上提供的抽象,演示和出版物的性别组成。评估了根据性别和医学专业的转换率。使用Fisher精确测试或Chi方向测试比较比例.Resultsamong 198提出的摘要,103(52%)发表。放射肿瘤学具有最高的出版率,90%(肿瘤学56%,放射40%)。医学专业之间的出版率有显着差异(P <.001)。女性呈现的七种摘要份额与男性呈现的48%的摘要出版。总体而言,由于随后的转化转变为每个专业(p = .25-1.0)的科学出版物之间没有显着差异在医学肿瘤学中,66%的摘要来自妇女,57%的摘要出版了。在已发布的摘要中,83%的摘要和出版物的第一作者具有相同的作者。在那些失去第一作者身份的人中,59%是女性。但是,第一作者状态丧失的专业之间没有统计学意义.Conclusionswe观察到2013年至2016年,妇女在放射肿瘤学中具有最高的展示和出版率。需要更多的预期数据来监测所有专业中女性的进展及其特定需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号