首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Construct Validity of an Instrument for Assessment of Reflective Writing-Based Portfolios of Medical Students
【24h】

Construct Validity of an Instrument for Assessment of Reflective Writing-Based Portfolios of Medical Students

机译:构建仪器的有效性,用于评估反思写入基于医学学生的投资组合

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: Assessment of reflective writing for medical students is challenging, and there is lack of an available instrument with good psychometric properties. The authors developed a new instrument for assessment of reflective writing-based portfolios and examined the construct validity of this instrument. Methods: After an extensive literature review and pilot testing of the instrument, two raters assessed the reflective writing-based portfolios from years 2 and 3 medical students (n=135) on three occasions. The instrument consists of three criteria: organization, description of an experience and reflection on the experience. We calculated the reliability of scores using generalizability theory with a fully crossed design and two facets (raters and occasions). In addition, we measured criterion validity by testing correlations with students’ scores using other assessment methods. Results: The dependability (Φ) coefficient of the portfolio scores was 0.75 using two raters on three occasions. Students’ portfolio scores represented 46.6% of the total variance across all score comparisons. The variance due to occasions was negligible, while the student–occasion interaction was small. The variance due to student–rater interaction represented 17.7%, and the remaining 27.7% of the variance was due to unexplained sources of error. The decision (D) study suggested that an acceptable dependability (Φ = 0.70 and 0.72) can be achieved by using two raters for one and two occasions, respectively. Finally, we found moderate to large effect-size correlations between students’ scores in reflective writing-based portfolios and communication skills (r = 0.47) and PBL tutorials (r = 0.50). Conclusion: We demonstrated the presence of different sources of evidence that support construct validity of the study instrument. Further studies are warranted before utilizing this instrument for summative assessment of students’ reflective writing-based portfolios in other medical schools.
机译:目的:对医学生的反思写作评估是挑战性的,并且缺乏有可用的仪器具有良好的心理测量性能。作者开发了一种评估基于反射性写入的投资组合的新仪器,并检查了该仪器的构建有效性。方法:经过广泛的文献综述和仪器试验检测,两个评估者在三次评估了从2年和3年的医学生(N = 135)的反思写入的投资组合。该仪器由三个标准组成:组织,描述经验和体验的思考。我们使用完全交叉的设计和两方面(评估者和场合)计算了使用完全性理论的分数的可靠性。此外,我们通过使用其他评估方法测试与学生评分的相关性来测量标准有效性。结果:三次使用两次评分的产品分数的可靠性(Φ)系数为0.75。学生的投资组合得分占所有成绩比较总方差的46.6%。由于场合导致的方差可以忽略不计,而学生会互动则很小。由于学生 - 律互动导致的差异为17.7%,剩余的27.7%的差异是由于无法解释的错误来源。决定(D)研究表明,可以通过分别使用两个评分器来实现可接受的可靠性(φ= 0.70和0.72)。最后,我们发现学生在基于反射写入的投资组合和通信技巧(R = 0.47)和PBL教程(R = 0.50)之间的学生分数之间的效果大小相关性。结论:我们证明了支持构建研究仪器的有效性的不同证据来源的存在。在利用本仪器之前,请进一步进行研究,以便在其他医学院进行学生反思写作的投资组合的总结评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号