首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Biological Chemistry >Comparison of Patient Satisfaction between Brachial Plexus Block (Axillary Approach) and General Anesthesia for Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Historical Cohort Study
【24h】

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction between Brachial Plexus Block (Axillary Approach) and General Anesthesia for Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Historical Cohort Study

机译:肱骨丛(腋窝方法)与远端半径裂缝外科治疗的患者满意度的比较:历史队列研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Distal radius fracture surgery is performed under general (GA) or regional anesthesia with brachial plexus block (NB). Whether anesthesia type affects patient outcomes is unclear. This study retrospectively compared patient satisfaction between GA and NB after surgery. Methods: This was a historical cohort study of 80 (34 GA and 46 NB) patients who underwent volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Propensity score analysis was used to generate a set of matched cases (NB) and controls (GA), yielding 14 matched patient-pairs. The simplified patient satisfaction scale was compared for primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were anesthesia and surgery duration, hospital stay length, adverse events, postoperative analgesic requirement, and wrist range of motion (ROM) 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Results: After propensity score matching, patients in almost all cases in both groups were "Satisfied" (effect size: 0.1, p = 0.572), indicating little significant difference. Significant differences in adverse events and postoperative analgesic use observed before matching disappeared after matching. Anesthesia duration and hospital stay length were significantly shorter in the NB group (effect size: -1.27 and -0.77, p = 0.00074 and p = 0.0388, respectively), as was surgery duration (effect size: -0.84, p = 0.0122) after matching. Similar to before matching, wrist ROM significantly improved in the NB group (effect size: 1.11, p = 0.0279) in the early postoperative period, but the difference disappeared at 3 months postoperatively. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction between distal radius fracture surgery under GA and NB was similar. Nerve block could help shorten hospital stay length and surgery duration and improve postoperative functional recovery.
机译:背景:远端半径骨折手术由一般(GA)或具有肱骨丛嵌段(NB)的区域麻醉进行。无论是麻醉类型是否会影响患者结果尚不清楚。本研究回顾性比较了手术后GA和NB之间的患者满足。方法:这是一个历史队列的80(34克和46个NB)患者的历史队列研究,他们接受了远端半径骨折的Volar平板固定。倾向得分分析用于产生一组匹配的病例(NB)和对照(GA),产生14个匹配的患者对。将简化的患者满意度进行比较,以获得主要结果。二次结果是麻醉和手术持续时间,医院保持长度,不良事件,术后镇痛要求和术后2周和3个月的腕表范围。结果:在倾向得分匹配后,两组几乎所有病例的患者都是“满意”(效果大小:0.1,P = 0.572),表明差异很大。在匹配后,在匹配后观察到不良事件和术后镇痛使用的显着差异。麻醉持续时间和医院保持长度在Nb组中较短匹配。类似于匹配之前,在术后早期Nb组(效果大小:1.11,p = 0.0279)中,腕部显着改善,但术后3个月差异消失。结论:GA和NB下远端半径骨折手术之间的患者满意度相似。神经块可以帮助缩短医院保持长度和手术持续时间,并改善术后功能恢复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号