【24h】

Introduction to the research

机译:研究简介

获取原文
           

摘要

Innovations in glass technologies and engineering over the last decades have altered the way we perceive glass. Combining transparency, durability and a compressive strength exceeding that of concrete and even structural steel, glass has evolved in the engineering world from a brittle, fragile material to a reliable structural component with high compressive load-carrying capacity. At present, the structural applications of glass in architecture are constantly increasing, yet with a considerable geometrical limitation: although glass’s fabrication boundaries have been continuously stretching so far, glass structures are still dominated by the limited shapes which can be generated by the combination of the virtually 2-dimensional, planar elements produced by the float industry. Whereas glass panels in float production can stretch more than 20 m in length, the width is restricted to 3.21 or 4.5 m and the maximum commercial thickness is only 25 mm (Lyons 2010; Schittich et al. 2007; Patterson 2011).Cast glass can overcome the design limitations imposed by the 2-dimensional nature of float glass. By pouring molten glass into moulds, solid 3-dimensional glass components of almost any shape and cross-section can be obtained1. Such objects can be shaped to form repetitive units for free-form full-glass structures that do not buckle due to their slender proportions, thus taking full advantage of the high compressive strength of glass; a solution little explored so far. Discouraging factors such as the meticulous and time-consuming annealing process required, the to-date non-standardized production, and the corresponding high manufacturing costs, have limited cast glass to only a handful of realized architectural applications. Consequently, there is a lack of engineering data and a general unawareness of the potential and risks of building with cast glass as a structural material. The loadbearing function of cast glass in architecture remains an unmapped field.Scope of this research is to explore the structural potential and limitations of solid cast glass components and introduce cast glass as a promising construction material in architecture, indicating both the potential and limitations of this alternative production process for glass in buildings. To achieve this, the research focuses on the development and experimental validation of two new design concepts for selfsupporting envelopes made almost entirely of cast glass components: adhesively bonded and interlocking cast glass components.
机译:过去几十年来玻璃技术和工程的创新改变了我们感知玻璃的方式。结合透明度,耐用性和压缩强度超过混凝土甚至结构钢,玻璃在工程世界中从脆性,脆弱的材料中进化到具有高压缩载荷容量的可靠结构部件。目前,玻璃结构中的结构在架构中不断增加,但是具有相当大的几何限制:虽然玻璃的制造边界已经连续拉伸,但玻璃结构仍然由可以通过组合产生的有限形状来占主导地位几乎二维,由浮子工业生产的平面元素。虽然浮动生产中的玻璃面板长度长度超过20米,但宽度限制在3.21或4.5米,最大商业厚度仅为25毫米(Lyons 2010; Schittich等,2007;帕特森2011).cast玻璃可以克服浮法玻璃二维性质所施加的设计限制。通过将熔融玻璃倒入模具中,可以获得几乎任何形状和横截面的固体三维玻璃组分1。这些物体可以成形为形成重复单元,用于自由形状的全玻璃结构,其由于它们的细长比例而不会扣,从而充分利用玻璃的高抗压强度;到目前为止一点探索的解决方案。令人沮丧的因素,如细致和耗时的退火过程所需的,迄今为止的非标准化生产和相应的高制造成本,只有有限的铸造玻璃,只有少数实现建筑应用。因此,缺乏工程数据和铸造玻璃作为结构材料的建筑物的潜力和风险的一般性。架构中的铸造玻璃的负荷功能仍然是一个未映射的领域。这项研究的探索是探讨了固体铸造玻璃部件的结构潜力和限制,并将铸造玻璃引入了架构中的有希望的建筑材料,表明这两个潜力和限制建筑物中玻璃的替代生产过程。为此,研究侧重于两种新设计概念的开发和实验验证,为铸造玻璃部件几乎完全完全制造的自动化信封:粘接和互锁的铸造玻璃组分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号