...
首页> 外文期刊>Current oncology >A cost–utility analysis of atezolizumab in the second-line treatment of patients with metastatic bladder cancer
【24h】

A cost–utility analysis of atezolizumab in the second-line treatment of patients with metastatic bladder cancer

机译:atezolizumab在转移性膀胱癌患者的二线治疗中的成本实用性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Despite initial promising results, the IMvigor211 clinical trial failed to demonstrate an overall sur-vival (os) benefit for atezolizumab compared with chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of metastatic bladder cancer (mbc). However, given  lessened adverse events (aes) and preserved quality of life (qol) with atezolizumab, there might still be investment value. To evaluate that potential value, we conducted a cost–utility analysis (cua) of atezolizumab compared with chemotherapy from the perspective of the Canadian health care payer.Methods A partitioned survival analysis model was used to evaluate atezolizumab compared with chemotherapy over a lifetime horizon (5 years). The base-case analysis was conducted for the intention-to-treat (itt) population, with additional scenario analyses for subgroups by IMvigor-defined PD-L1 status. Effectiveness was evaluated through life–year gains and quality-adjusted life–years (qalys). Cost estimates in 2018 Canadian dollars for systemic treatment, aes, and end-of-life care were incorporated. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (icer) was used to compare treatment strategies. Parameter and model uncertainty were assessed through sensitivity and scenario analyses. Per Canadian guidelines, cost and effectiveness were discounted at 1.5%.Results For the itt population, the expected qalys for atezolizumab and chemotherapy were 0.75 and 0.56, with expected costs of $90,290 and $8,466 respectively. The resultant icer for atezolizumab compared with chemotherapy was $430,652 per qaly. Scenario analysis of patients with PD-L1–positive tumours led to a lower icer ($334,387 per qaly). Scenario analysis of observed compared with expected benefits demonstrated a higher icer, with a shorter time horizon ($928,950 per qaly).Conclusions Despite lessened aes and preserved qol, atezolizumab is not considered cost-effective for the second-line treatment of mbc.
机译:背景技术尽管初步有前途的结果,但IMVigor211临床试验未能证明与在转移性膀胱癌(MBC)的二线治疗中的化疗相比,atezolizumab的总体vival(OS)益处。然而,给予减少不良事件(AES)并保存了与atezolizumab的生命质量(QoL),可能仍有投资价值。为了评估潜在价值,我们与加拿大医疗保健支付者的角度相比,与化疗相比,atezolizumab的成本实用性分析5年)。对意图对治疗(ITT)群体进行了基本情况分析,通过IMVigor定义的PD-L1状态对子组进行了额外的场景分析。通过生命年增长和质量调整的寿命(QALYS)评估有效性。成本估计2018年加拿大为全身治疗,AES和终生护理的成本估计。增量成本效益率(ICER)用于比较治疗策略。通过灵敏度和场景分析评估参数和模型不确定性。每个加拿大准则,成本和有效性均折扣为1.5%。关于ITT人口的必要条款,atezolizumab和化疗的预期qalys为0.75和0.56,分别预期为90,290美元和8,466美元。与化疗相比的atezolizumab所得的算术为430,652美元。 PD-L1阳性肿瘤患者的情景分析导致较低的ICER(每QALY $ 334,387)。观察到的情况分析与预期的效益相比,展示了一个更高的注册因素,时间较短,较短的时间(每QALY为928,950美元)。尽管AES和保存的QoL减少,但atezolizumab不考虑对MBC的二线治疗成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号