首页> 外文期刊>Creative Education >The Pupil’s Discourse and Action Projects: The Case of Third Year High School Pupils in Tunisia
【24h】

The Pupil’s Discourse and Action Projects: The Case of Third Year High School Pupils in Tunisia

机译:学生的话语和行动项目:突尼斯三年高中学生的案例

获取原文
       

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to describe the language interaction of pupils in a football game situation and to show how the action plans are implemented. We have opted for a descriptive/exploratory methodology that seeks to convey the pupil’s language typologies: 8 sessions lasting one hour each with 14 boys aged 18 years and T = 8 hours of actual practice. The goal is to help pupils to understand what happens during the play situation in order to co-construct and implement a project of collective action. The study includes: 1)a qualitative analysis (Roulet, 1987) of Team“A”which aims to identify action projects developed by the boys, 2)a quantitative analysis of the same team (Gréhaigne, Billiards,& Laroche, 1999) seeking to check the implementation of these projects. The quantitative study showed that pupils were able to validate their action plans during the eight sessions. These results should be linked to the notion of“communication contract.”Indeed, in every act of communication, partners understand and interact with each other by validating what makes sense to them, namely:“the collective intentions”(Searle, 1991),“joint intentionality”(Sensevy, 2008) and“negotiation”(Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 1984).
机译:本文的目的是描述学生在足球比赛情况下的语言互动,并展示如何实施行动计划。我们选择了一种描述性/探索方法,寻求传达学生的语言类型:8个会议持续一小时,每年14岁,14岁,T = 8小时的实际实践。目标是帮助学生了解在游戏情况下会发生什么,以便共同构建和实施集体行动的项目。该研究包括:1)团队的定性分析(Roulet,1987),旨在识别由男孩开发的行动项目,2)对同一团队的定量分析(Gréhaigne,台球,1999年)寻求检查这些项目的实施。定量研究表明,学生能够在八个会议期间验证其行动计划。这些结果应与“沟通合同”的概念相关联。实际上,在每一项沟通行为中,合作伙伴通过验证对他们有意义的原因来互相理解和互动,即:“集体意图”(Searle,1991), “联合意向性”(Sensevy,2008)和“谈判”(Kerbrat-Orecchioni,1984)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号