首页> 外文期刊>Contrast media & molecular imaging >Histogram Analysis and Visual Heterogeneity of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping in the Prediction of Molecular Subtypes of Invasive Breast Cancers
【24h】

Histogram Analysis and Visual Heterogeneity of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping in the Prediction of Molecular Subtypes of Invasive Breast Cancers

机译:侵袭性乳腺癌分子亚型预测中表观扩散系数测绘的扩散加权成像的直方图分析及视觉异质性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective. To investigate if histogram analysis and visually assessed heterogeneity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping can predict molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancers. Materials and Methods. In this retrospective study, 91 patients with invasive breast carcinoma who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DWI at our institution were included. Two radiologists delineated a 2-D region of interest (ROI) on ADC maps in consensus. Tumors were also independently classified into low and high heterogeneity based on visual assessment of DWI. First-order statistics extracted through histogram analysis within the ROI of the ADC maps (mean, 10th percentile, 50th percentile, 90th percentile, standard deviation, kurtosis, and skewness) and visually assessed heterogeneity were evaluated for associations with tumor receptor status (ER, PR, and HER2 status) as well as molecular subtype. Results. HER2-positive lesions demonstrated significantly higher mean (p=0.034), Perc50 (p=0.046), and Perc90 (p=0.040), with AUCs of 0.605, 0.592, and 0.652, respectively, than HER2-negative lesions. No significant differences were found in the histogram values for ER and PR statuses. Neither quantitative histogram analysis based on ADC maps nor qualitative visual heterogeneity assessment of DWI images was able to significantly differentiate between molecular subtypes, i.e., luminal A versus all other subtypes (luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple negative) combined, luminal A and B combined versus HER2-enriched and triple negative combined, and triple negative versus all other types combined. Conclusion. Histogram analysis and visual heterogeneity assessment cannot be used to differentiate molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer.
机译:客观的。为了研究具有表观扩散系数(ADC)映射的扩散加权成像(DWI)的直方图分析和视觉评估的异质性,可以预测侵入性乳腺癌的分子亚型。材料和方法。在这个回顾性研究中,包括在我们所在机构的术前磁共振成像(MRI)的91例侵入性乳腺癌患者。两个放射科医生在共识的ADC地图上划定了2-D兴趣区域(ROI)。基于DWI的视觉评估,肿瘤也独立分为低和高异质性。通过ADC地图的ROI内的直方图分析提取的一阶统计数据(平均值,第10百分位数,第50百分位,第90百分位数,第90百分位,标准偏差,kurtOsis和视觉评估的异质性进行评估,用于肿瘤受体状态(ER, PR和HER2状态)以及分子亚型。结果。 Her2阳性病变显着高于平均值(p = 0.034),PERC50(P = 0.046)和PERC90(P = 0.040),分别比HER2阴性病变分别为0.605,0.592和0.652。在ER和PR状态的直方图值中没有发现显着差异。基于ADC地图的定量直方图分析和DWI图像的定性视觉异质性评估能够显着区分分子亚型,即Luminal A与所有其他亚型(腔B,HER2富含和三重阴性)组合,腔A和B综合与HER2浓缩和三重阴性组合,三重阴性与所有其他类型相结合。结论。直方图分析和视觉异质性评估不能用于区分侵入性乳腺癌的分子亚型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号