...
首页> 外文期刊>Complexity >Decisions and Coordination in a Capacity Sharing Supply Chain considering Production Cost Misreporting
【24h】

Decisions and Coordination in a Capacity Sharing Supply Chain considering Production Cost Misreporting

机译:考虑生产成本误报的能力共享供应链中的决策和协调

获取原文

摘要

In the manufacturing capacity sharing platform, considering the manufacturing capacity provider’s cost misreporting behavior and the collusion behavior of the platform operator, this paper built a supply chain consisting of a platform operator, a capacity provider with surplus capacity, and a manufacturer with insufficient capacity. This paper studied the influence of the cost misreporting behavior on the supply chain members’ decisions and profits. By use of the game theory, in the scenarios including the supplier misreporting to other supply chain members and the supplier colluding with the platform, the paper analyzed the optimal pricing decision, misreporting coefficient decision, and platform’s service fee decision and further compared the profits of the supply chain and its members. The results show that the capacity provider tends to overstate the production cost for gaining more profits, which exerts negative effects on profits of other members and the supply chain. Compared with the case of misreporting to both the manufacturer with insufficient capacity and the platform, the case of colluding with platform is more favorable to the profits of the manufacturer, the platform, and the supply chain, while the supplier prefers to choose the former situation. When the sales revenue-sharing proportion, cost-sharing proportion, and service fee satisfy certain conditions, the sales revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contract can avoid the capacity provider’s cost misreporting behavior and coordinate the supply chain.
机译:在制造能力共享平台中,考虑到制造能力提供商的成本误报行为和平台运营商的勾结行为,本文建立了由平台运营商,容量剩余容量的容量提供商组成的供应链,以及容量不足的制造商。本文研究了成本误报行为对供应链成员决策和利润的影响。通过利用博弈论,在包括供应商误报到其他供应链成员和供应商与平台的供应商斗争的情况下,分析了最佳定价决策,误报系数决策和平台的服务费决定,进一步比较了盈利供应链及其成员。结果表明,该产能提供者倾向于夸大促销更多利润的生产成本,这对其他成员和供应链的利润产生了负面影响。与误报的情况相比,由于容量不足和平台的误报,与平台的斗争的情况更为有利于制造商,平台和供应链的利润,而供应商更喜欢选择前者。当销售收入分享比例,成本共享比例和服务费满足某些条件时,销售收入共享和成本分摊合同可以避免容量提供商的成本误报行为并协调供应链。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号