首页> 外文期刊>International journal of production economics >Supply chain coordination to optimize manufacturer's capacity procurement decisions through a new commitment-based model with penalty and revenue-sharing
【24h】

Supply chain coordination to optimize manufacturer's capacity procurement decisions through a new commitment-based model with penalty and revenue-sharing

机译:供应链协调,通过基于惩罚和收益共享的基于承诺的新模型来优化制造商的能力采购决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study a commitment-based revenue-sharing and penalty model is proposed to coordinate a supply chain with one manufacturer and a retailer facing stochastic demand. Because of short time to respond to demand and long capacity procurement lead time, the manufacturer needs to procure capacity in advance. As capacity procurement involves monetary investment, it may lead to under-estimation if the risk has to be solely borne by the manufacturer. In contrast, the approach developed within this study induces the retailer to commit not less than the expected demand. At the same time, under-purchase penalty is also introduced to avoid over-commitment. Furthermore, as regards to the existing contract approaches, the retailer is provided of a certain flexibility in terms of under-purchase penalty to avoid transferring the whole demand uncertainty risk on the retailer. On the other hand, the manufacturer is also motivated to produce more through reward in terms of higher revenue percentage for the products demanded more than the commitment. The proposed model is compared with those models based on prevailing revenue-sharing with penalty contracts, in terms of commitment and capacity procurement decisions. Numerical experiments and sensitivity analysis are presented to demonstrate the usefulness of the model and the relative managerial insights.
机译:在这项研究中,提出了一种基于承诺的收益共享和惩罚模型,以协调与一个制造商和零售商面对随机需求的供应链。由于响应需求的时间短且容量采购的交货时间长,因此制造商需要提前采购容量。由于能力采购涉及货币投资,因此如果风险必须完全由制造商承担,则可能会导致估计不足。相比之下,本研究中开发的方法促使零售商做出不低于预期需求的承诺。同时,还引入了购买不足的惩罚,以避免过度承诺。此外,对于现有的合同方式,零售商在购买不足惩罚方面具有一定的灵活性,以避免将整体需求不确定性风险转移给零售商。另一方面,制造商也有动机通过奖励来生产更多产品,这是因为需求比承诺更高的产品的收入百分比更高。在承诺和能力采购决策方面,将提议的模型与基于现行惩罚性合同收益共享的模型进行比较。进行了数值实验和敏感性分析,以证明该模型的有效性和相关的管理见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号