...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Sarcoma Research >Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92
【24h】

Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92

机译:生存受到国际随机对照试验中的局部肉瘤的局部治疗方法的影响:Eicess-92分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Two national clinical trial groups, United Kingdom Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG) and the German Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Group (GPOH) together undertook a randomised trial, EICESS-92, which addressed chemotherapy options for Ewing's sarcoma. We sought the causes of unexpected survival differences between the study groups. 647 patients were randomised. Cox regression analyses were used to compare event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two study groups. 5-year EFS rates were 43% (95% CI 36-50%) and 57% (95% CI 52-62) in the CCLG and GPOH patients, respectively; corresponding 5-year OS rates were 52% (95% CI 45-59%) and 66% (95% CI 61-71). CCLG patients were less likely to have both surgery and radiotherapy (18 vs. 59%), and more likely to have a single local therapy modality compared to the GPOH patients (72 vs. 35%). Forty-five percent of GPOH patients had pre-operative radiotherapy compared to 3% of CCLG patients. In the CCLG group local recurrence (either with or without metastases) was the first event in 22% of patients compared with 7% in the GPOH group. After allowing for the effects of age, metastases, primary site, histology and local treatment modality, the risk of an EFS event was 44% greater in the CCLG cohort (95% CI 10-89%, p?=?0.009), and the risk of dying was 30% greater, but not statistically significant (95% CI 3-74%, p?=?0.08). Unexpected differences in EFS and OS occurred between two patient cohorts recruited within an international randomised trial. Failure to select or deliver appropriate local treatment modalities for Ewing's sarcoma may compromise chances of cure.Trial registration Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe (Grants No. DKH M43/92/Jü2 and DKH 70-2551 Jü3), and European Union Biomedicine and Health Programme (Grants No. BMH1-CT92-1341 and BMH4-983956), and Cancer Research United Kingdom. Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT0000251.
机译:两个国家临床试验团体,英国儿童癌症和白血病组(CCLG)和德国儿科肿瘤学和血液学组(GPOH)共同进行了一项随机试验Eicess-92,为eicing的肉瘤提供了化疗选择。我们寻求研究组之间意外的生存差异的原因。 647例患者随机化。 Cox回归分析用于比较两项研究组之间的无事项存活(EFS)和总体存活(OS)。 5年的EFS率分别为CCLG和GPOH患者的43%(95%CI 36-50%)和57%(95%CI 52-62);相应的5年的OS率为52%(95%CI 45-59%)和66%(95%CI 61-71)。 CCLG患者不太可能具有手术和放疗(18 vs.59%),与GPOH患者相比,更有可能具有单一的局部治疗方式(72 vs.35%)。 45%的GPOH患者具有术前放疗与3%的CCLG患者相比。在CCLG组中,局部复发(无论有或没有转移)是22%患者的第一次事件,而GPOH组中的7%。在允许年龄,转移,原始部位,组织学和局部治疗方式的效果之后,CCLG队列中,EFS事件的风险更大(95%CI 10-89%,P?= 0.009),和死亡的风险大于30%,但没有统计学意义(95%CI 3-74%,P?= 0.08)。在国际随机试验中招募的两个患者队列之间发生EFS和OS的意外差异。未能选择或提供适当的当地治疗方式对于ewing的肉瘤可能会损害固化的机会。德意志Krebshilfe(授予DKH M43 / 92 /JÜ2和DKH70-2551JÜ3)和欧盟生物医学和健康计划(授予No.BMH1-CT92-1341和BMH4-983956)和癌症研究英国。可以找到临床试验信息:NCT0000251。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号