...
首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >The effect of a single spinal manipulation on cardiovascular autonomic activity and the relationship to pressure pain threshold: a randomized, cross-over, sham-controlled trial
【24h】

The effect of a single spinal manipulation on cardiovascular autonomic activity and the relationship to pressure pain threshold: a randomized, cross-over, sham-controlled trial

机译:单一脊柱操纵对心血管自主活性的影响及压力疼痛阈值的关系:随机,交叉,假手术试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The autonomic nervous system interacts with the pain system. Knowledge on the effects of high velocity low amplitude spinal manipulations (SM) on autonomic activity and experimentally induced pain is limited. In particular, the effects of SM on autonomic activity and pain beyond the immediate post intervention period as well as the relationship between these two outcomes are understudied. Thus, new research is needed to provide further insight on this issue. The aim was to assess the effect of a single SM (i.e. SM vs. sham) on cardiovascular autonomic activity. Also, we assessed the relationship between cardiovascular autonomic activity and level of pain threshold after the interventions. We conducted a randomized, cross-over, sham-controlled trial on healthy first-year chiropractic students comprising two experimental sessions separated by 48?h. During each session, subjects received, in a random order, either a thoracic SM or a sham manipulation. Cardiovascular autonomic activity was assessed using heart rate and systolic blood pressure variabilities. Pain sensitivity was assessed using pressure pain threshold. Measurements were performed at baseline and repeated three times (every 12?min) during the post intervention period. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded. The effect of the SM was tested with linear mixed models. The relationship between autonomic outcomes and pressure pain threshold was tested with bivariate correlations. Fifty-one participants were included, forty-one were finally analyzed. We found no statistically significant difference between SM and sham in cardiovascular autonomic activity post intervention. Similarly, we found no post-intervention relationship between cardiovascular autonomic activity and pressure pain threshold. Our results suggest that a single SM of the thoracic spine has no specific effect on cardiovascular autonomic activity. Also, we found no relationship between cardiovascular autonomic activity and pressure pain threshold after the SM. Further experimental research should consider the use of several markers of autonomic activity and a more comprehensive pain assessment. N° NCT03273868. Registered September 6, 2017.
机译:自主神经系统与疼痛系统相互作用。关于高速低振幅脊髓操纵(SM)对自主主义和实验诱导疼痛的影响的知识。特别是,SM对自主活性和疼痛的影响,超出了直接后干预期的影响以及这两种结果之间的关系。因此,需要进行新的研究以对此问题提供进一步的见解。目的是评估单个SM(即Smm)对心血管自主主义活动的影响。此外,我们评估了在干预措施后心血管自主活动和疼痛阈值水平之间的关系。我们在健康的第一年脊椎按摩学学生进行了随机,跨对照试验,其中包括两个实验课程,分隔48?H.在每个会话期间,受试者以随机顺序收到胸部SM或假操作。使用心率和收缩压变性评估心血管自主主义活动。使用压力疼痛阈值评估疼痛敏感性。在后介入期间,在基线进行测量并重复三次(每12次)(每12?分钟)。参与者和结果评估员被蒙蔽了。用线性混合模型测试SM的效果。通过双变量相关性测试自主后果和压力疼痛阈值之间的关系。包括五十一名参与者,最终分析了四十一。我们发现SM和Sham在心血管自主主义活动后干预中没有统计学意义。同样,我们发现心血管自主活性和压力疼痛阈值之间没有干预后关系。我们的研究结果表明,单个SM的胸椎对心血管自主活动没有具体影响。此外,我们发现在SM后心血管自主活动和压力疼痛阈值之间没有关系。进一步的实验研究应考虑使用自主活动的几个标记和更全面的疼痛评估。 n°NCT03273868。 2017年9月6日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号