首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >A systematic literature review of the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in non-treatment resistant patients with major depressive disorder
【24h】

A systematic literature review of the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in non-treatment resistant patients with major depressive disorder

机译:对重复抑制患者重复颅脑磁刺激(RTMS)临床疗效的系统文献综述抑制患者的主要抑郁症

获取原文
           

摘要

The clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment resistant patients (at least 4 medication trials) appears to be well accepted and forms the coverage policies and rTMS's use in many of the largest US payers. However, less is known about rTMS's use in patients who have undergone ≤1 failed medication trial. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the clinical efficacy of rTMS in patients after ≤1 medication trials. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all articles which addressed the use of rTMS in ≤1 medication trial. All types of study designs were included and assessed for quality and strength of evidence using: GRADE and CEBM. Searches of peer reviewed articles were undertaken for the year 2000 to the present. All languages were considered. Electronic databases were searched and included: PubMed and EBSCO. Evidence assessment websites were also searched and included: Cochrane, NICE, AHRQ, and ICER. Additionally, the clinical guidelines for specialty societies which use rTMS was searched. Hand searches of the reference sections of identified articles was also undertaken. Electronic and other sources identified 165 after duplicates were removed. Twenty two articles were assessed for eligibility and ultimately 10 articles were included in the systematic review and graded. Six articles were graded high quality (CEBM/GRADE: 1c/B) demonstrating that the use of rTMS was clinically efficacious in patients after ≤1 medication trial. Four additional trials demonstrated a positive effect of rTMS in patients after ≤1 medication trial but were of a lower quality. The use of rTMS in patients after ≤1 medication trial should be considered. US payers should consider revising their coverage policies to include the use of rTMS in these patients.
机译:重复的经颅磁刺激(RTMS)在治疗抗性患者(至少4种药物试验)的临床疗效似乎得到了很好的接受,并在美国许多最大的付款人中形成了覆盖政策和RTMS。然而,较少是rtms在经历≤1患者的患者使用的rtms的用途。该分析的目的是确定≤1药物试验后RTMS在患者中的临床疗效。对文献进行了系统审查,以确定涉及使用RTMS≤1药物试验的所有物品。所有类型的学习设计都被包括并评估了使用:等级和CEBM的证据质量和实力。对同行评审文章的搜索是2000年到现在的2000年。所有语言都被考虑在内。搜索和包括电子数据库:PubMed和EBSCO。还搜索了证据评估网站,包括:Cochrane,Nice,AHRQ和ICER。此外,搜查了使用RTMS的专业社团的临床准则。还进行了所识别物品的参考部分的手。除去重复后,电子和其他来源识别165。评估了二十两篇文章的资格,最终将10篇文章纳入系统审查和评分。六篇文章高质量(CEBM /级:1C / B),证明在≤1药物试验后患者使用RTMS在临床上有效。另外四次试验表明≤1药物试验后患者RTMS对患者的阳性作用,但质量较低。应考虑≤1药物试验后患者RTMS的使用。美国付款人应考虑修改其覆盖政策,包括在这些患者中使用RTMS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号