首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Distal locked versus unlocked intramedullary nailing for stable intertrochanteric fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Distal locked versus unlocked intramedullary nailing for stable intertrochanteric fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:远端锁定与解锁髓内钉用于稳定的跨转化骨折,系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Intramedullary nails have become the main treatment for intertrochanteric fractures. However, a distal locking procedure during nailing gradually raised controversy. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials was performed to summarize existing evidence, aiming to determine the safety and efficacy of distal locking or unlocking in the nailing of stable intertrochanteric fractures. Appropriate articles were identified using the most common public databases, such as PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from the inception of each database to April 2019, without restriction of language, publication date, and considering ongoing trials. Eligible studies were represented by randomized controlled trials or retrospective cohort studies, comparing distal locking and unlocking for the treatment of acute stable intertrochanteric fractures in adult patients. Information regarding methodological quality, patient demographics, and clinical outcomes were extracted independently by two reviewers. Subsequently, patients were divided into a locking and unlocking group. This study included 9 articles, comprising a total of 1978 patients with a similar baseline. The results showed that the unlocking group had a shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, lower transfusion rate, and less thigh pain after the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture when compared with the distal locking group. No significant differences were observed in safety-related outcomes, including mortality, infection rate, cutting out, loss of reduction, backing out of lag screws, cephalic screw breakage, nail breakage, and peri-implant fractures between the two groups. In addition, efficacy-related outcomes including nonunion, delayed healing rates, and the Harris functional score were not significantly different between the two groups. Our pooled analysis demonstrated that distal unlocking of stable intertrochanteric fractures can shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding, and reduce the blood transfusion rate. The use of locked or unlocked intramedullary nailing does not affect long-term outcomes regarding complications and function.
机译:髓内钉已成为跨转化体骨折的主要处理。然而,在钉子期间的远端锁定程序逐渐提出了争议。在这项研究中,进行了系统评价和临床试验的荟萃分析,总结了现有的证据,旨在确定远端锁定或解锁在稳定的跨转子骨折中的安全性和有效性。使用最常见的公共数据库确定了适当的文章,例如PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆和Google Scholar,从每个数据库开始到2019年4月,而不限制语言,出版日期,并考虑正在进行的审判。符合条件的研究是由随机对照试验或回顾性队列研究代表的,比较远端锁定和解锁成人患者急性稳定较股剂骨折的治疗。有关方法论质量,患者人口统计学和临床​​结果的信息是独立提取的两种审稿人。随后,患者分为锁定和解锁组。该研究包括9篇文章,共有1978例患有类似基线的患者。结果表明,与远端锁定组相比,解锁组的操作时间较短,术中出血,较低的输出率低,输血率降低,较低的大腿疼痛。在安全相关的结果中没有观察到显着差异,包括死亡率,感染率,切除,减少丧失,退出滞后螺钉,头部螺钉破裂,指甲断裂和两组之间的围植入骨折。此外,两组之间的疗效相关的结果包括非阴性,延迟愈合率和哈里斯官能评分没有显着差异。我们的汇总分析表明,稳定的跨传感器骨折的远端解锁可以缩短操作时间,降低术中出血,降低血液输血率。锁定或解锁的髓内钉的使用不会影响关于并发症和功能的长期结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号