首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Comparison of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis in adults
【24h】

Comparison of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis in adults

机译:后近晶型清创融合与融合在成人中中胸脊髓结核治疗中的前晶型清创和融合的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:The surgical procedures for mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis mainly include anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion. Until now, the surgical choice is still controversial. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic (T5-9) spinal tuberculosis in adult patients.METHODS:Eighty-seven cases with mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis were treated with anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion (Group A, n?=?39) and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion (Group B, n?=?48) from January 2007 to June 2014. Parameters including the operation time, blood loss, time of ESR and CRP decreasing to the normal level, time of abscess disappearance, time of bone graft fusion, rate of surgical complications, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale were compared between two groups to evaluate their therapeutic effects.RESULTS:All patients were followed up for 5-10?years with the mean of 6.2?±?1.1?years. No significant differences were observed regarding the gender composition ratio, age, course of disease, number of lesion segments, and preoperative indexes of ESR, CRP, VAS score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale between the two groups. Besides, no significant differences were observed regarding VAS score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale between the two groups in the 5th postoperative year (P??0.05). However, the operation time (158.2?±?10.7?min vs. 183.7?±?14.1?min), blood loss (517.9?±?76.5?ml vs.714.6?±?57.4?ml), time of ESR (2.3?±?1.1?months vs.3.1?±?1.4?months) and CRP (1.1?±?0.3?months vs.1.2?±?0.6?months) decreasing to the normal level, time of abscess disappearance (2.7?±?1.6?months vs.4.9?±?1.9?months), and time of bone graft fusion (6.6?±?0.8?months vs.8.0?±?9.6?months) in Group A were less than those in Group B (P??0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Both anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion have a low risk of surgical complications and provide good quality of life for the patients with mid-thoracic (T5-9) spinal tuberculosis followed up in the mid-term. Moreover, the anterior procedure leads to early resolution of the disease and faster fusion.
机译:背景:中胸部脊髓结核的外科手术主要包括前晶体清创和融合和后腔后腔清洁和融合。到目前为止,外科选择仍然存在争议。本研究旨在比较前后血管清创和融合在成人患者中胸部(T5-9)脊髓结核中的后腔后血液和融合的临床疗效。方法:八十七种胸椎结核用前后晶体清创和融合(A,N?= 39组)和后腔后杂交和融合(B组,N?= 39),从2007年1月到2014年6月。参数包括操作时间,失血, ESR和CRP的时间递减到正常水平,脓肿消失时间,骨移植融合时间,手术并发症率,视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分,脊柱角度和SF-36比例在两组之间进行了比较来评估它们治疗效果。结果:所有患者随访5-10岁,平均值为6.2?±1.1?年。对于两组之间的ESR,CRP,VAS评分,脑脊菌角和SF-36等级的性别组成比,年龄,疾病,病变阶段,病变阶段数和术前指标没有显着差异。此外,在术后第5年(P?> 0.05)中,两组之间的VAS得分,脑脊角和SF-36规模没有显着差异(P?> 0.05)。但是,操作时间(158.2?±10.7?min与183.7?±14.1?min),血液损失(517.9?±76.5?±±57.4 ml),ESR的时间(2.3 ?±1.1?月份vs.3.1?±1.4个月)和CRP(1.1?±0.3?月份vs.1.2?±0.6?月)减少到正常水平,脓肿失踪时间(2.7?± ?1.6?月份vs.4.9?±1.9?几个月),骨移植融合的时间(6.6?±0.8?0.8?月份vs.8.0?±9.6?月)小于B组( p?<?0.05)。结论:前晶脉络和融合和后腔后腔清创和融合均具有低胸部(T5-9)脊髓结核患者的患者提供良好的生活质量在中期。此外,前程导致疾病的早期分辨率和更快的融合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号