首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis in adults
【2h】

Comparison of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis in adults

机译:后近晶型清创融合与融合在成人中中胸脊髓结核治疗中的前晶型清创和融合的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background The surgical procedures for mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis mainly include anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion. Until now, the surgical choice is still controversial. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic (T5–9) spinal tuberculosis in adult patients. Methods Eighty-seven cases with mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis were treated with anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion (Group A, n = 39) and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion (Group B, n = 48) from January 2007 to June 2014. Parameters including the operation time, blood loss, time of ESR and CRP decreasing to the normal level, time of abscess disappearance, time of bone graft fusion, rate of surgical complications, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale were compared between two groups to evaluate their therapeutic effects. Results All patients were followed up for 5–10 years with the mean of 6.2 ± 1.1 years. No significant differences were observed regarding the gender composition ratio, age, course of disease, number of lesion segments, and preoperative indexes of ESR, CRP, VAS score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale between the two groups. Besides, no significant differences were observed regarding VAS score, kyphosis angle and SF-36 scale between the two groups in the 5th postoperative year (P > 0.05). However, the operation time (158.2 ± 10.7 min vs. 183.7 ± 14.1 min), blood loss (517.9 ± 76.5 ml vs.714.6 ± 57.4 ml), time of ESR (2.3 ± 1.1 months vs.3.1 ± 1.4 months) and CRP (1.1 ± 0.3 months vs.1.2 ± 0.6 months) decreasing to the normal level, time of abscess disappearance (2.7 ± 1.6 months vs.4.9 ± 1.9 months), and time of bone graft fusion (6.6 ± 0.8 months vs.8.0 ± 9.6 months) in Group A were less than those in Group B (P < 0.05). Conclusions Both anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion and posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion have a low risk of surgical complications and provide good quality of life for the patients with mid-thoracic (T5–9) spinal tuberculosis followed up in the mid-term. Moreover, the anterior procedure leads to early resolution of the disease and faster fusion.
机译:摘要背景中胸脊椎结核的外科手术主要包括前晶体清卓人和融合和后腔后苔和融合。到目前为止,外科选择仍然存在争议。本研究旨在比较前晶体清创和融合与后腔后血管作品和融合在成人患者中中期胸部(T5-9)脊柱结核中的临床疗效。方法2007年1月至2014年6月,用前后脊状清除和融合(A,N = 39组)和融合(A,N = 39组)和融合(B组,N = 48)治疗八十七种患者。参数包括操作时间,失血,ESR的时间和CRP的正常水平,脓肿消失时间,骨移植融合时间,手术并发症率,视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分,脊柱角度和SF-36等级在两组之间进行比较来评估其治疗效果。结果所有患者均均为5-10年,平均值为6.2±1.1岁。对于两组之间的ESR,CRP,VAS评分,脑脊菌角和SF-36等级的性别组成比,年龄,疾病,病变阶段,病变阶段数和术前指标没有显着差异。此外,在术后第5年(P> 0.05)中,两组之间的VAS评分,脑脊角和SF-36规模没有观察到显着差异(P> 0.05)。但是,操作时间(158.2±10.7分钟与183.7±14.1分钟),失血(517.9±76.5 ml Vs.714.6±57.4 ml),ESR的时间(2.3±1.1个月与3.1±1.4个月)和CRP (1.1±0.3个月vs.1.2±0.6个月)降低正常水平,脓肿消失时间(2.7±1.6个月与4.9±1.9个月),骨移植融合时间(6.6±0.8个月Vs.8.0± 9.6个月)A组低于B组(P <0.05)。结论前部进行静脉内清创和融合和后腔后腔清洁和融合具有较低的手术并发症的风险,为中期后胸部脊髓结核患者提供良好的生活质量。此外,前程导致疾病的早期分辨率和更快的融合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号