A meta-analysis of serum osteocalcin level in postmenopausal osteoporotic women compared to controls

摘要

BACKGROUND:Circulatory osteocalcin (OC) has been widely used as a biomarker to indicate bone turnover status in postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). However, the change of serum OC (sOC) level in PMO cases compared to postmenopausal controls remains controversial.METHODS:We searched the online database of PubMed and Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis of case-control studies was performed to compare the pooled sOC level between PMO patients and postmenopausal controls. Subgroup analysis according to potential confounding factors (different OC molecules and regions of the study population) was also performed.RESULTS:Ten case-control studies with 1577 postmenopausal women were included in this meta analysis. We found no significant difference in the pooled sOC level [mean difference (MD)?=?1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): (-?1.49, 5.16), p?=?0.28] between PMO patients and controls. Subgroup analysis also revealed no significant difference in intact OC [MD?=?1.76, 95%CI: (-?1.71, 5.23), p?=?0.32] or N-terminal mid-fragment of the OC molecule [MD?=?0.67, 95%(-?5.83, 7.18), p?=?0.84] between groups. For different regions, no significant difference in sOC was found in Asian population between cases and controls [MD?=?-0.06, 95%(-?6.02, 5.89), p?=?0.98], while the pooled sOC level was significantly higher in European PMO cases than controls [MD?=?3.15, 95%(0.90, 5.39), p?=?0.006].CONCLUSIONS:Our analysis revealed no significant difference in sOC level between PMO cases and controls according to all the current eligible studies. OC molecules are quite heterogeneous in the circulation and can be influenced by glucose metabolism. Therefore, sOC is currently not a good indicator for the high bone turnover status in PMO. More trials with standardized methodologies for the evaluation of circulatory OC are awaited to update our current findings.