首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >The value of social practice theory for implementation science: learning from a theory-based mixed methods process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

The value of social practice theory for implementation science: learning from a theory-based mixed methods process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial

机译:社会实践理论的实施科学价值:从基于理论的混合方法学习随机对照试验的过程评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Although there is trial evidence that complex interventions are effective for the self-management of heart failure, little evidence supports their effectiveness in routine practice. We used Social Practice Theory to guide a Type 1 Hybrid Trial: a mixed methods process evaluation of a complex intervention for heart failure. The objective of this paper is to explore the value of Social Practice Theory for implementation science. Social Practice Theory informed a mixed methods process evaluation of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a 12?week home-based intervention to optimise self-care support for people with heart failure and their caregivers - Rehabilitation EnAblement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF). Interviews were conducted with 19 people with heart failure and 17 caregivers at 4?months and 12?months after recruitment into the trial. Cases were constructed at the level of the individual, couple, facilitator and centre; and included multi-modal process and outcome data. Evaluative coding and subsequent within- and cross-case analyses enabled the development of a typology of relationships linking fidelity of intervention delivery and tailoring of content to individual needs and concerns. Social Practice Theory was used to interrogate the relationships between elements of the intervention and their implementation. Of 216 trial participants, 107 were randomised to the intervention (REACH-HF plus usual care). The intervention was most effective when fidelity was high and delivery was tailored to the individual’s needs, but less effective when both tailoring and fidelity were low. Theory-based analysis enabled us to model complex relationships between intervention elements (competencies, materials and meanings) and social context. The findings illustrate how intervention fidelity and tailoring are contextual and how the effectiveness of the REACH-HF intervention depended on both optimal alignment and implementation of these elements. The study demonstrates the utility of theory-based analysis which integrates data from multiple sources to highlight contexts and circumstances in which interventions work best. Social Practice Theory provides a framework for guiding and analysing the processes by which a complex intervention is evaluated in a clinical trial, and has the potential to guide context-specific implementation strategies for clinical practice. ISRCTN, IISRCTN86234930 . Registered 13th November 2014.
机译:虽然有试验证据表明复杂的干预措施对于心力衰竭的自我管理有效,但很少的证据支持他们在常规实践中的有效性。我们使用了社会实践理论来指导1型混合试验:混合方法对心力衰竭复杂干预的过程评估。本文的目的是探讨社会实践理论的实施科学的价值。社会实践理论了解混合方法的流程评估了一个12?周的家庭干预的多中心随机对照试验,以优化心力衰竭及其照顾者的自我护理支持 - 慢性心力衰竭的康复启用(达到 - HF)。采访是用19人进行的心力衰竭和17个照顾者,4个月和12个月,招聘审判后几个月。案件是在个人,夫妇,促进者和中心的水平上建造的;并包括多模态流程和结果数据。评估编码和随后的内部和横壳分析使得在与个人需求和关注的个人需求和顾虑定制内容的关系的关系的类型学社会实践理论用于审查干预元素与其实施之间的关系。在216名试验参与者中,107人被随机分配到干预(REACH-HF加常规护理)。当保真度高并且送货时,干预是最有效的,因为剪裁和保真度均低于个人的需求,但减少了效率。基于理论的分析使我们能够在干预元素(能力,材料和含义)和社会背景之间建模复杂关系。研究结果说明了干预保真度和剪裁是如何语境性的,以及如何达到-HF干预的有效性取决于这些元素的最佳对准和实现。该研究展示了基于理论的分析的效用,该分析集成了来自多个来源的数据,以突出显示干预措施最佳的背景和情况。社会实践理论提供了一个框架,用于指导和分析在临床试验中评估复杂干预的过程,并有可能导致临床实践的上下文的实施策略。 ISRCTN,IISRCTN86234930。 2014年11月13日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号