首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Revisiting the trajectory of medical students’ empathy, and impact of gender, specialty preferences and nationality: a systematic review
【24h】

Revisiting the trajectory of medical students’ empathy, and impact of gender, specialty preferences and nationality: a systematic review

机译:重新审视医学学生同理心的轨迹,以及性别,特色偏好和国籍的影响:系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Empathy allows a physician to understand the patient’s situation and feelings and respond appropriately. Consequently, empathy gives rise to better diagnostics and clinical outcomes. This systematic review investigates the level of empathy among medical students across the number of educational years and how this level relates to gender, specialty preferences, and nationality. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), the authors conducted a systematic search of studies published between February 2010 and March 2019 investigating the level of empathy among medical students. The databases PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched. Studies employing quantitative methodologies and published in English or Scandinavian language and examining medical students exclusively were included. Thirty studies were included of which 24 had a cross-sectional and 6 a longitudinal study design. In 14 studies, significantly lower levels of empathy were reported by increase in the number of educational years. The remaining 16 studies identified both higher, mixed and unchanged levels. In 18 out of 27 studies it was reported that females had higher empathy scores than males. Only three out of nine studies found an association between empathy scores and specialty preferences. Nine out of 30 studies reported a propensity towards lower mean empathy scores in non-Western compared to Western countries. The results revealed equivocal findings concerning how the empathy level among medical students develops among medical students across numbers of educational years and how empathy levels are associated with gender, specialty preferences, and nationality. Future research might benefit from focusing on how students’ empathy is displayed in clinical settings, e.g. in clinical encounters with patients, peers and other health professionals.
机译:同理心允许医生了解患者的情况和情感并适当地回应。因此,同理心会产生更好的诊断和临床结果。这种系统审查调查了在教育年度数量以及该水平与性别,特种偏好和国籍有关的同情水平。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),作者对2010年2月至2019年3月在2010年2月至2019年3月调查了医学生的同情水平的研究中进行了系统搜索。搜索数据库,EMBASE和PSYCINFO被搜查。包括定量方法和用英语或斯堪的纳维亚语言发表的研究以及专门审查医学生的研究。包括三十项研究,其中24个具有横截面和6个纵向研究设计。在14项研究中,通过增加教育年龄的增加,报告了同情程度明显较低。其余16研究确定了更高,混合和不变的水平。在27项研究中有18项据报道,女性比男性更高的同情绩。只有三项研究中只有三种研究发现同理心评分和特色偏好之间的关联。与西方国家相比,30项研究中有九项研究报告了非西方的较低平均同情评分的倾向。结果揭示了有关医学生的同情水平如何在教育年份和移民水平与性别,特种偏好和国籍相关联的医学生体学生之间发展的同情调查结果。未来的研究可能会受益于专注于学生的同理心如何在临床环境中显示,例如,在临床遭遇与患者,同龄人和其他卫生专业人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号