...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Usefulness of sputum gram stain for etiologic diagnosis in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Usefulness of sputum gram stain for etiologic diagnosis in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:痰革兰染色在社区肺炎的病因诊断的用途:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Implementation of sputum Gram stain in the initial assessment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients is still controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the usefulness of sputum Gram stain for defining the etiologic diagnosis of CAP in adult patients. We systematically searched the Medline, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus and LILACS databases for full-text articles. Relevant studies were reviewed by at least three investigators who extracted the data, pooled them using a random effects model, and carried out quality assessment. For each bacterium (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Gram-negative bacilli), pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios were reported. After a review of 3539 abstracts, 20 articles were included in the present meta-analysis. The studies included yielded 5619 patients with CAP. Pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity of sputum Gram stain were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.56-0.62) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.86-0.89) respectively for S. pneumoniae, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97) for H. influenzae, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.53-0.87) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) for S. aureus, and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.77) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99) for Gram-negative bacilli. Sputum Gram stain test is sensitive and highly specific for identifying the main causative pathogens in adult patients with CAP. This study has been registered at PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews under registration no. CRD42015015337 .
机译:在初步评估社区获得的肺炎(帽)患者的初步评估中的实施仍存在争议。我们进行了系统审查和荟萃分析,以研究痰革革革纹的有用性,用于定义成人患者帽的病因诊断。我们系统地搜索了Medline,Embase,Science Direct,Scopus和Lilacs数据库以获取全文文章。通过提取数据的至少三个调查人员审查了相关研究,使用随机效果模型汇总了它们,并进行了质量评估。对于每种细菌(肺炎链球菌,嗜血体流感,金黄色葡萄球菌和革兰氏阴性芽孢杆菌),报道了合并的敏感性,特异性,阳性和负似然比。在审查3539摘要后,目前的Meta分析中包含20篇文章。研究包括含量的5619例帽。痰革兰氏染色的合并敏感性和汇总特异性分别为0.59(95%CI,0.56-0.62)和0.87(95%CI,0.86-0.89),S.Pneumoniae,0.78(95%CI,0.72-0.84)和0.96( HOMENENIZAE的95%CI,0.94-0.97),0.72(95%CI,0.53-0.87)和0.97(95%CI,0.95-0.99),0.64(95%CI,0.49-0.77)革兰氏阴性杆菌的0.99(95%CI,0.97-0.99)。痰革兰氏染色试验对成年患者的主要致病病原体敏感,高度特异性。本研究已在Prospero International Prospection of Systematic of Systematic Processic of Systematic Processic of Systematic寄存器登记。 CRD42015015337。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号