首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
【24h】

Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach

机译:患者和临床护理提供者的膀胱癌特异性生存监护计划的开发和评估:多方法方法

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE:In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the iterative development, acceptability and feasibility of BC specific SCP (BC-SCP) in clinical settings.METHODS:In Phase I, we developed the BC-SCP. In Phase II, we conducted four focus groups with 19 patients and 15 providers to examine its acceptability and usability challenges. Data analyses using the Atlas.ti program, informed refinement of the BC-SCP. In Phase III, we conducted feasibility testing of the refined BC-SCP with 18 providers from 12 health-centers. An encounter survey was completed after each assessment to examine the feasibility of the BC-SCP. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used for comparative analyses.RESULTS:During phase I, we observed high patient and provider acceptability of the BC-SCP and substantial engagement in improving its content, design, and structure. In Phase II, providers completed 59?BC-SCPs. Mean time for BC-SCP completion was 12.3?min. Providers reported that BC-SCP content was clear, did not hamper clinic flow and was readily completed with easy-to-access information. Comparative analyses to examine differences in SCP completion time by patient clinico-demographic characteristics and provider type revealed no significant differences.CONCLUSIONS:Our BC-SCP has clinical relevance, and can be used in an active practice setting. However, considerable progress will be necessary to achieve implementation of and sharing the BC-SCP with patients and care providers, particularly within the electronic medical record. In summary, BC-SCPs are essential to improve the follow up care of BC survivors. Clinical resources are required to ensure appropriate implementation of BC-SCPs.TRIAL REGISTRATION:Study HUM00056082.
机译:背景,背景和目的:尽管他们的影响混合了证据,建议生存的护理计划(SCPS)来提高癌症幸存者的护理质量。关于膀胱癌(BC)中SCPS的可行性的数据是稀疏的。使用混合方法方法,本研究描述了临床设置中BC特异性SCP(BC-SCP)的迭代发育,可接受性和可行性。方法:在I阶段,我们开发了BC-SCP。在II阶段,我们用19名患者和15个提供商进行了四个焦点组,以检查其可接受性和可用性挑战。数据分析使用atlas.ti程序,通知BC-SCP的细化。在第三阶段,我们对来自12个卫生中心的18个提供者进行了可行性测试。在每次评估后,在每次评估后完成遭遇调查,以检查BC-SCP的可行性。 Chi-Square和Fisher精确测试用于比较分析。结果:在I阶段,我们观察到BC-SCP的高患者和提供者可接受性以及在提高其内容,设计和结构方面的大量敬意。在第二阶段,提供商完成了59次BC-SCP。 BC-SCP完成的平均时间为12.3?min。供应商报告说,BC-SCP内容清晰,没有妨碍诊所流程,并且随着易于访问的信息而易于完成。对比较分析来检查患者临床人口统计学特性和提供者类型的SCP完成时间差异显示无显着差异。结论:我们的BC-SCP具有临床相关性,可用于主动实践环境。但是,在患者和护理提供者中,尤其是在电子病历中实现和分享BC-SCP的实施和共享BC-SCP的实施相当大的进展。总之,BC-SCP对于改善BC幸存者的后续护理至关重要。需要临床资源以确保适当实施BC-SCPS.Trial注册:研究HUM00056082。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号