首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Development of a complex community pharmacy intervention package using theory-based behaviour change techniques to improve older adults’ medication adherence
【24h】

Development of a complex community pharmacy intervention package using theory-based behaviour change techniques to improve older adults’ medication adherence

机译:使用基于理论的行为改变技术的复杂社区药房干预包的开发,以提高老年人的药物依从性

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:To improve the effectiveness of interventions targeting non-adherence in older adults, a systematic approach to intervention design is required. The content of complex interventions and design decisions are often poorly described in published reports which makes it difficult to explore why they are ineffective. This intervention development study reports on the design of a community pharmacy-based adherence intervention using 11 Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) which were identified from previous qualitative research with older patients using the Theoretical Domains Framework.METHODS:Using a group consensus approach, a five-step design process was employed. This focused on decisions regarding: (1) the overall delivery format, (2) formats for delivering each BCT; (3) methods for tailoring BCTs to individual patients; (4) intervention structure; and (5) materials to support intervention delivery. The APEASE (Affordability; Practicability; Effectiveness/cost-effectiveness; Acceptability; Side effects/safety; Equity) criteria guided the selection of BCT delivery formats.RESULTS:Formats for delivering the 11 BCTs were agreed upon, for example, a paper medicines diary was selected to deliver the BCT 'Self-monitoring of behaviour'. To help tailor the intervention, BCTs were categorised into 'Core' and 'Optional' BCTs. For example, 'Feedback on behaviour' and 'Action planning' were selected as 'Core' BCTs (delivered to all patients), whereas 'Prompts and cues' and 'Health consequences' were selected as 'Optional' BCTs. A paper-based adherence assessment tool was designed to guide intervention tailoring by mapping from identified adherence problems to BCTs. The intervention was designed for delivery over three appointments in the pharmacy including an adherence assessment at Appointment 1 and BCT delivery at Appointments 2 and 3.CONCLUSIONS:This paper details key decision-making processes involved in moving from a list of BCTs through to a complex intervention package which aims to improve older patients' medication adherence. A novel approach to tailoring the content of a complex adherence intervention using 'Core' and 'Optional' BCT categories is also presented. The intervention is now ready for testing in a feasibility study with community pharmacists and patients to refine the content. It is hoped that this detailed report of the intervention content/design process will allow others to better interpret the future findings of this work.
机译:背景:为了提高针对老年人的非依从性的干预措施的有效性,需要一种系统的干预设计方法。复杂干预和设计决策的内容通常在公布的报告中赘言,这使得难以探索为什么它们无效。该干预开发研究报告了使用11个行为改变技术(BCT)的社区药房的依据依据性干预的设计报告,该技术与使用理论域框架的老年患者的先前定性研究确定了。方法:使用一组共识方法,五 - 采用了设计过程。这侧重于有关的决定:(1)整体交付格式,(2)用于提供每个BCT的格式; (3)对个体患者剪裁BCT的方法; (4)干预结构; (5)支持干预交付的材料。 apaee(可负担能力;实用性;有效性/成本效益;可接受性;副作用/安全;股权)标准引导了BCT交付格式的选择。结果:达成11个BCT的格式,例如,纸药日记商定被选中以提供BCT'自我监控行为'。为了帮助定制干预,BCTS分为“核心”和“可选”BCTS。例如,“对行为”和“动作规划”的反馈被选为“核心”BCT(送到所有患者),而“提示和提示”和“健康后果”被选为“可选”BCT。旨在通过将识别的粘附问题从识别的粘附问题映射到BCT来指导纸质依据评估工具。该干预旨在为药房提供三次约会,包括预约1和BCT递送的申请评估2和3.Conclusions:本文详细介绍了从BCT列表转移到复杂的关键决策过程旨在改善老年患者的药物依从性的干预套餐。还提出了一种使用“核心”和“可选”BCT类别来定制复杂遵守干预的内容的新方法。干预措施现在准备在与社区药剂师和患者中进行可行性研究,以优化内容。希望干预内容/设计过程的这一详细报告将允许其他人更好地解释这项工作的未来发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号