首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >An economic evaluation of a specialist preventive care clinician in a community mental health service: a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

An economic evaluation of a specialist preventive care clinician in a community mental health service: a randomised controlled trial

机译:社区心理健康服务中专家预防保健临床医生的经济评估:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND:Clinical practice guidelines and policies direct community mental health services to provide preventive care to address chronic disease risks, however, such care is infrequently provided in routine consultations. An alternative model of care is to appoint a clinician to the dedicated role of offering and providing preventive care in an additional consultation: the 'specialist clinician' model. Economic evaluations of models of care are needed to determine the cost of adhering to guidelines and policies, and to inform pragmatic service delivery decisions. This study is an economic evaluation of the specialist clinician model; designed to achieve policy concordant preventive care delivery.METHODS:A retrospective analysis of the incremental costs, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of a 'specialist preventive care clinician' (an occupational therapist) was conducted in a randomised controlled trial, where participants were randomised to receive usual care; or usual care plus the offer of an additional preventive care consultation with the specialist clinician. The study outcome was client acceptance of referrals to two free telephone-based chronic disease prevention services. This is a key care delivery outcome mandated by the local health district policy of the service. The base case analysis assumed the mental health service cost perspective. A budget impact analysis determined the annual budget required to implement the model of care for all clients of the community mental health service over 5 years.RESULTS:There was a significantly greater increase from baseline to follow-up in the proportion of intervention participants accepting referrals to both telephone services, compared to usual care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $347 per additional acceptance of a referral (CI: $263-$494). The annual budget required to implement the model of care for all prospective clients was projected to be $711,446 over 5-years; resulting in 2616 accepted referrals.CONCLUSIONS:The evaluation provides key information regarding the costs for the mental health service to adhere to policy targets, indicating the model of care involved a low per client cost whilst increasing key preventive care delivery outcomes. Additional modelling is required to further explore its economic benefits.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ACTRN12616001519448. Registered 3 November 2016, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371709.
机译:背景:临床实践指南和政策直接社区心理健康服务,为解决慢性疾病风险提供预防性护理,但是,这种护理很少提供常规磋商。替代护理模式是指定临床医生,以额外磋商中提供和提供预防性护理的专用作用:“专业临床医生”模型。需要对护理模型进行经济评估,以确定遵守指导方针和政策的成本,并告知务实的服务交付决定。本研究是对专业临床医生模型的经济评估;旨在实现政策协调的预防性护理。方法:对“专业预防保健诊所”(职业治疗师)的增量成本,成本效益和预算影响的回顾性分析在随机对照试验中进行了参与者随机接受常规护理;或通常的护理加上专家临床医生提供额外预防性护理咨询的提议。研究结果是客户接受对两种免费电话的慢性疾病预防服务的推荐。这是当地卫生区的服务政策授权的关键护理递送结果。基本案例分析假设心理健康服务成本透视。预算影响分析确定了在5年内确定所有客户的护理模式所需的年度预算。结果:在接受转介的干预参与者的比例中,基线与后续行动显着提高了与通常的护理相比,两者都是电话服务。每额外接受推荐的增量成本效益率为347美元(CI:$ 263- $ 494)。实施所有潜在客户的护理模式所需的年度预算预计为711,446美元超过5年;导致2616年接受的推荐。结论:评估提供了有关精神卫生服务费用的关键信息,以遵守政策目标,表明每位客户的效果涉及低于每个客户的成本,同时增加重点预防性护理结果。需要额外的建模,以进一步探索其经济效益.Tird注册:ACTRN12616001519448。注册2016年11月3日,https://www.anzctr.org.au/trial/registration/trialreview.aspx?id=371709。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号