...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Measuring implementation: development of the implementation process assessment tool (IPAT)
【24h】

Measuring implementation: development of the implementation process assessment tool (IPAT)

机译:衡量实施:实施过程评估工具的开发(iPat)

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Implementation science comprises a large set of theories suggesting interacting factors at different organisational levels. Development of literature syntheses and frameworks for implementation have contributed to comprehensive descriptions of implementation. However, corresponding instruments for measuring these comprehensive descriptions are currently lacking. The present study aimed to develop an instrument measuring care providers' perceptions of an implementation effort, and to explore the instrument's psychometric properties.METHODS:Based on existing implementation literature, a questionnaire was designed with items on individual and team factors and on stages of change in an implementation process. The instrument was tested in a Norwegian study on implementation of evidence based practices for psychosis. Item analysis, factor structure, and internal consistency at baseline were examined.RESULTS:The 27-item Implementation Process Assessment Tool (IPAT) revealed large variation between mean score of the items. The total scale scores were widely dispersed across respondents. Internal consistency for the total scale was high (Cronbach's alpha: .962), and all but one item contributed positively to the construct. The results indicated four underlying constructs: individual stages for behavioural change, individual activities and perceived support, collective readiness and support, and individual perceptions of the intervention.CONCLUSIONS:The IPAT appears to be a feasible instrument for investigating the implementation process from the perspective of those making the change. It can enable examination of the relative importance of factors thought to be essential for implementation outcomes. It may also provide ongoing feedback for leaders tailoring support for teams to improve implementation. However, further research is needed to detect the instrument's properties later in the implementation process and in different contexts.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov code NCT03271242 (retrospective registered September 5, 2017).
机译:背景:实施科学包括一系列理论,建议在不同组织层面的相互作用因素。实施的文献合成和实施框架的发展有助于实现对实施的全面描述。然而,目前缺乏用于测量这些全面描述的相应仪器。本研究旨在制定衡量护理提供商对实施努力的看法,并探索仪器的心理学特性。方法:根据现有的实施文献,调查问卷是设计了个人和团队因素的项目,以及变革的阶段。在实施过程中。该仪器在挪威人关于实施精神病循证实践的研究中进行了测试。检查项目分析,因子结构和基线的内部一致性。结果:27项实施过程评估工具(IPAT)在均值分数之间显示出大的变化。总规模分数广泛分散给受访者。总比例的内部一致性高(Cronbach的Alpha:.962),除了一个项目之外,所有物品都对构建进行了积极贡献。结果表明了四种潜在的构建体:行为变革的个别阶段,个人活动和感知支持,集体准备和支持以及对干预的个人看法。结论:IPAT似乎是从视角来调查实施过程的可行文书那些改变的人。它可以审查因素认为对实施成果至关重要的重要性。它还可以为领导者定制支持的持续反馈,以便为团队改进实施。然而,需要进一步的研究来检测实施过程中的仪器的性质,并在不同的上下文中.Tial注册:ClinColicalTrials.gov码NCT03271242(2017年9月5日注册注册)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号