...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Cost-effectiveness analysis of doctor-pharmacist collaborative prescribing for venous thromboembolism in high risk surgical patients
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of doctor-pharmacist collaborative prescribing for venous thromboembolism in high risk surgical patients

机译:高危手术患者静脉血栓栓塞治疗静脉血栓栓塞的成本效益分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Current evidence to support cost effectiveness of doctor- pharmacist collaborative prescribing is limited. Our aim was to evaluate inpatient prescribing of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis by a pharmacist in an elective surgery pre-admission clinic against usual care, to measure any benefits in cost to the healthcare system and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) of patients. A decision tree model was developed to assess cost effectiveness of pharmacist prescribing compared with usual care for VTE prophylaxis in high risk surgical patients. Data from the literature was used to inform decision-tree probabilities, utility, and cost outcomes. In the intervention arm, a pharmacist prescribed patient's regular medications, documented a VTE risk assessment and prescribed VTE prophylaxis. In the usual care arm, resident medical officers were responsible for prescribing regular medications, and for risk assessment and prescribing of VTE prophylaxis. The base scenario assessed the cost effectiveness of a pre-existing pre-admission clinic pharmacy service that takes on a collaborative prescribing role. The alternative scenario assessed the benefits of introducing a pre-admission clinic pharmacy service where previously there had not been one. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore uncertainty in the model. In both the base-case scenario and the alternative scenario pharmacist prescribing resulted in an increase in the proportion of patients adequately treated and a decrease in the incidence of VTE resulting in cost savings and improvement in quality of life. The cost savings were $31 (95% CI: -$97, $160) per patient in the base scenario and $12 (95% CI: -$131, $155) per patient in the alternative scenario. In both scenarios the pharmacist-doctor prescribing resulted in an increase in QALYs of 0.02 (95% CI: -0.01, 0.005) per patient. The probability of being cost effective at a willingness to pay off $40,000 was 95% in the base scenario and 94% in the alternative scenario. Delegation of the prescribing of VTE prophylaxis for high risk surgical patients to a pharmacist prescriber in PAC, as part of a designated scope of practice, would result in fewer cases of VTE and associated lower costs to the healthcare system and increased QALYs gained by patients. Pre admission clinic study registered with ANZCTR-ACTR Number ACTRN12609000426280 .
机译:目前支持医生合作规定的成本效益的证据是有限的。我们的目的是评估药剂师在选修外科前诊所的药剂师对通常护理的药剂师进行住院治疗静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防,以衡量患者医疗保健系统和质量调整后的终身生活年份(QALYS)的任何益处。制定了决策树模型,以评估药剂师处方的成本效益,而在高风险外科患者中的VTE预防常规护理。来自文献的数据用于通知决策树概率,实用程序和成本结果。在干预臂中,药剂师规定的患者的正规药物,记录了VTE风险评估和规定的VTE预防。在通常的护理手臂中,居民医务人员负责规定定期药物,以及风险评估和对VTE预防的规定。基本方案评估了预先参加诊所药房服务的成本效益,这些诊所药房服务采用合作的处方作用。替代方案评估了引入预先入场前诊所药房服务的好处,以前没有一份。进行了概率敏感性分析,以探讨模型中的不确定性。在基本情况和替代方案药剂师处方导致患者足够治疗的比例增加,并且VTE的发生率降低导致成本节约和改善生活质量。在替代方案中,每位患者节省成本为每位患者为31美元(95%CI: - $ 97,160美元),每位患者在替代方案中每位患者12美元(95%CI: - $ 131,155)。在这两种情况下,药剂师医生处方导致每位患者增加0.02(95%CI:-0.01,00.005)的qalys。在拟计40,000美元的愿意下,成本效益的概率在基础方案中为95%,替代方案中的94%。作为指定实践范围的药剂师处方的高风险手术患者对高风险外科患者的副血统预防的代表团将导致vTE的案例和相关的较低成本,并增加患者的qalys。预先入场诊所研究在ANZCTR-ACTR编号ACTRN12609000426280注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号