首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychology >Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study
【24h】

Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study

机译:没有技术语言的心理动力学案例配方:可靠性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment planning beyond each specific clinician-patient dyad, a case formulation must convey valid information concerning the patient, as well as being a reliable source of information regardless of the clinician's theoretical orientation. The first aim of the present study is to explore the completeness of unstructured psychodynamic formulations, according to four components outlined in the Case Formulation Content Coding Method (CFCCM). The second aim is to estimate the reliability of independent formulations and their components, using similarity ratings of matched versus mismatched cases.METHODS:This study explores psychodynamic case formulations as made by two or more experienced clinicians after listening to an evaluation interview. The clinicians structured the formulations freely, with the sole constraint that technical, theory-laden terminology should be avoided. The formulations were decomposed into components after all formulations had been written.RESULTS:The results indicated that most formulations were adequately comprehensive, and that overall reliability of the formulations was high (?0.70) for both experienced and inexperienced clinician raters, although the lower bound reliability estimate of the formulation component deemed most difficult to rate - inferred mechanisms - was marginal, 0.61.CONCLUSIONS:These results were achieved on case formulations made by experienced clinicians using simple experience-near language and minimizing technical concepts, which indicate a communicative quality in the formulations that make them clinically sound.TRIAL REGISTRATION:linicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2781-7 ., January 18, 2007.
机译:背景:弥合症状与治疗之间的差距,构建案例配方对于临床医生至关重要。由于质量,可靠性和有效性的问题,有限的科学价值归因于案例制剂。为了理解,沟通和治疗计划超越每个特定临床医生 - 患者二进制文件,案例制定必须传达有关患者的有效信息,以及无论临床医生的理论取向如何,是可靠的信息来源。本研究的首次目的是探讨非结构化的心理动力配方的完整性,根据案例制剂含量编码方法(CFCCM)中概述的四种组分。第二个目的是估算独立配方及其组分的可靠性,使用匹配与错配案例的相似性评级。方法:本研究探讨了在听取评估面试后由两个或多个经验丰富的临床医生制作的心理动力学案例配方。临床医生通过唯一的约束来自由地制定了制剂,唯一的限制应该避免技术,理论术语术语。在所有制剂的书面制剂后,制剂分解成组分。结果表明,大多数配方都充分全面,而且对经验丰富的临床评估者来说,配方的总体可靠性高(> 0.70),但虽然较低被认为最难以达到速率推断的机制的配方组分的结合可靠性估计 - 是边缘的,0.61。结论:这些结果是在经验丰富的临床医生使用简单经验附近语言制作的案例制剂的情况下实现了这些结果,并最大限度地减少了技术概念,这表明了交际质量在制作临床声音的配方中.trial注册:LinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00423462。 https://doi.org/10.1007/S00432-018-2781-7。,2007年1月18日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号