首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Supporting at-risk older adults transitioning from hospital to home: who benefits from an evidence-based patient-centered discharge planning intervention? Post-hoc analysis from a randomized trial
【24h】

Supporting at-risk older adults transitioning from hospital to home: who benefits from an evidence-based patient-centered discharge planning intervention? Post-hoc analysis from a randomized trial

机译:支持危险的老年人从医院到家转换:谁从基于证据为基础的患者的患者的放电计划干预?随机试验中的HOC分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Subgroups of older patients experience difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADL) following hospital discharge, as well as unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) presentations. We examine whether these subgroups of “at-risk” older patients benefit more than their counterparts from an evidence-based discharge planning intervention, on the following outcomes: (1) independence in ADL, (2) participation in life roles, (3) unplanned re-hospitalizations, and (4) ED presentations. This study used data from a randomized control trial involving 400 hospitalized older patients with acute and medical conditions, recruited through 5 sites in Australia. Participants receive either HOME, a patient-centered discharge planning intervention led by an occupational therapist; or a structured in-hospital consultation. HOME uses a collaborative approach for goal setting and includes pre and post-discharge home visits as well as telephone follow-up. Characteristics associated with higher risks of adverse outcomes were recorded and at-risk subgroups were created (mild cognitive impairment, walking difficulty, comorbidity, living alone and no support from family). Independence in ADL and participation in life roles were assessed with validated questionnaires. The number of unplanned re-hospitalizations and ED presentations were extracted from medical files. Linear regression models were conducted to detect variation in response to the intervention at 3-months, according to patients’ characteristics. Analyses revealed significant interaction effects for intervention by cognitive status for unplanned re-hospitalization (p?=?0.003) and ED presentations (p?=?0.021) at 3?months. Within the at-risk subgroup of mild cognitively impaired, the HOME intervention significantly reduced unplanned hospitalizations (p?=?0.027), but the effect did not reach significance in ED visits. While the effect of HOME differed according to support received from family for participation in life roles (p?=?0.019), the participation observed in HOME patients with no support was not significantly improved. Findings show that hospitalized older adults with mild cognitive impairment benefit from the HOME intervention, which involves preparation and post-discharge support in the environment, to reduce unplanned re-hospitalizations. Improved discharge outcomes in this at-risk subgroup following an occupational therapist-led intervention may enable best care delivery as patients transition from hospital to home. The trial was registered before commencement (ACTRN12611000615987).
机译:老年患者的亚组经历难以在医院排放后的日常生活(ADL)的活动,以及未申请医院入院和急诊部门(ED)介绍。我们检查这些亚组的“风险”老年患者的利益超过他们的证据排放计划干预的同行,提出以下结果:(1)ADL的独立性,(2)参与生活角色,(3)无计划的重新住院,(4)ED演示。本研究使用了来自随机控制试验的数据,涉及400名住院患者的急性和医疗条件的急性和医疗条件,通过澳大利亚的5个站点招募。参与者收到家庭,职业治疗师带领的患者以患者为中心的排放规划干预;或者在医院内部咨询。 Home使用一个协作方法进行目标设置,包括预先出院后的家庭访问以及电话随访。记录了与较高不良结果风险相关的特征,并创建了风险亚组(轻度认知障碍,行走困难,合并,单独生活,没有家庭的支持)。通过经过验证的问卷评估ADL的独立性和参与生活角色。从医疗文件中提取了无计预留的重新住院和编辑演示文稿的数量。根据患者的特征,进行了线性回归模型以检测响应于3个月的干预措施的变化。分析显示了通过认知状态的干预的显着相互作用效应,用于无计划的重新住院治疗(P?= 0.003)和ED介绍(P?= 0.021),在3个月内。在危险性障碍的风险中,家庭干预明显减少了未捕获的住院治疗(P?= 0.027),但效果在ed访问中没有达到重要意义。虽然家庭的效果根据来自家庭接受的支持,但参与生活角色(p?= 0.019),但在家庭患者中观察到没有载体的参与并未显着改善。调查结果表明,住院老年人具有轻度认知障碍的较轻的收益,涉及在环境中准备和放电后支撑的家庭干预,减少意外的重新住院。随着患者从医院转变为家庭,在职业治疗师LED干预后,在职业治疗师的干预后,这种风险亚群的放电结果可以提高。在开始之前注册了试验(ACTRN12611000615987)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号