首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Comparison of three-dimensional printing guides and double-layer guide plates in accurate bracket placement
【24h】

Comparison of three-dimensional printing guides and double-layer guide plates in accurate bracket placement

机译:三维印刷引导和双层引导板在精确支架放置中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of indirect bonding by either three-dimensional (3D) printing guides or double-layer guide plates. The results may serve as a clinical reference for bracket placements. In total, 140 teeth were collected and arranged into five pairs of full dentition. The marking points were labeled on the buccal/labial surface of the crown in these orthodontic study models. (1) 3D printing guide: A digital profile was generated using an intraoral scanner. Two types of indirect bonding guide, namely the whole denture type and the single tooth type, were designed with the 3Shape TRIOS? Standard intraoral scanner and fabricated using 3D printing technology. (2) Double-layer guide plate: A working model was obtained by replicating the experimental models, and the double-layer guide plate was then made of the inner layer soft film (1.0?mm thickness) and the outer layer hard film (0.6?mm or 0.8?mm thickness). Brackets were transferred from working models to study models by the indirect bonding trays. We measured and analyzed the distance between marking points and bracket placement. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 20.0 software. The accuracy of indirect bonding between 3D printing guide and double-layer guide plate was compared using paired t-test. According to our data, there was a significant difference between the 0.6?mm group and 0.8?mm group when the brackets were indirectly adhered using double-layer guide plates (p?=?0.036). However, no statistical significance in bracket positioning accuracy was revealed between two types of 3D printing guide (p?=?0.078), as well as between the 3D printing guide group and the 0.6?mm double-layer guide plate group (p?=?0.069). When applying double-layer guide plates for indirect bonding, the 0.6?mm group is more accurate than the 0.8?mm group. When utilizing 3D printing guides for indirect bonding, whole denture type is more accessible than single tooth type but with no significant difference in accuracy. The accuracy of indirect bonding is comparable when using 3D printing guides (whole denture type) and double-layer guide plates (0.6?mm).
机译:在目前的研究中,我们旨在评估三维(3D)印刷引导件或双层引导板的间接键合的准确性。结果可以作为支架放置的临床参考。总共收集140颗牙齿并排列成五对全牙齿。标记点在这些正畸研究模型中标记在冠的颊/唇表面上。 (1)3D打印指南:使用intraoral扫描仪生成数字轮廓。两种间接粘接指南,即整个义齿类型和单齿型,设计有3Shape Trios?标准口腔扫描仪和使用3D打印技术制造。 (2)双层引导板:通过复制实验模型而获得工作模型,然后由内层的软膜(1.0×mm厚)和外层硬膜(0.6)制成双层引导板(0.6厚度为0.8Ωmm或0.8毫米)。支架从工作模型转移到学习模型的间接粘合托盘。我们测量并分析了标记点与支架放置之间的距离。使用SPSS 20.0软件进行统计分析。使用配对T检验比较3D打印导向板与双层引导板之间的间接键合的精度。根据我们的数据,当使用双层导向板间接粘附时,0.6Ω组和0.8Ω组之间存在显着差异(P?= 0.036)。但是,在两种类型的3D打印指南(P?= 0.078)之间没有显示括号定位精度的统计学意义,以及3D打印导向组和0.6Ω双层引导板组(P?= ?0.069)。当施加双层引导板以进行间接键合时,0.6Ω组比0.8Ω组更精确。利用用于间接粘接的3D打印引导件时,整个义齿类型比单齿型更容易进入,但精度没有显着差异。当使用3D打印引导件(整个义齿类型)和双层引导板(0.6Ωmm)时,间接键合的精度是可比的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号