首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Imaging >Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers
【24h】

Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers

机译:修复Fontan患者的MRI特征跟踪的二维和三维应变测量的定量比较和普通儿童志愿者

获取原文
           

摘要

The accuracy of 2D and 3D strain analyses was evaluated by comparing strain and cardiac function parameters in Fontan repair patients and normal child volunteers. We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with Fontan circulation and 32 child volunteers who had undergone clinical cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of the dominant ventricle with a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. Global and regional strain (2D and 3D) of the dominant ventricle in both groups was assessed using CMR feature-tracking. Correlations between cardiac function and strain data were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were determined to evaluate repeatability and agreement. The 2D GLS showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (??16.49?±?5.00 vs. -19.49?±?2.03; p?=?0.002). The 2D GRS and 2D GCS showed no significant differences between two groups. 2D GRS: 38.96?±?14.48 vs. 37.46?±?7.77; 2D GCS: ??17.64?±?5.00 vs. -16.89?±?2.96, respectively; p??0.05). The 3D global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (3D GRS: 36.35?±?16.72 vs. 44.96?±?9.98; 3D GLS: ??8.86?±?6.84 vs. -13.67?±?2.44; 3D GCS: ??13.70?±?7.84 vs. -18.01?±?1.78; p??0.05, respectively). The ejection fraction (EF) and 3D GCS were significantly associated (r?=???0.491, p?=?0.004). The 3D GCS showed correlations with the indexed end-diastolic volume (EDV) (r?=?0.523, p?=?0.002) and indexed end-systolic volume (ESV) (r?=?0.602, p??0.001). 3D strain showed good reproducibility, with GCS showing the best inter-observer agreement (ICC?=?0.87 and CoV?=?5.15), followed by GLS (ICC?=?0.84 and CoV?=?5.36). 3D GCS is feasible, highly reproducible, and strongly correlated with conventional cardiac function measures. 3D GCS assessments may be useful for monitoring abnormal myocardial motion in patients with Fontan circulation.
机译:通过比较Fontan修复患者和正常儿童志愿者的菌株和心脏功能参数来评估2D和3D应变分析的准确性。我们回顾性地注册了32名Fontan流通患者,32名儿童志愿者经历了临床心脏磁共振(CMR)评估了1.5 Tesla MRI扫描仪。使用CMR特征跟踪评估两组中显性心室的全局和区域菌株(2D和3D)。使用Pearson的相关系数值评估心功能和应变数据之间的相关性。确定脑内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(COV)评估重复性和协议。 2D GLS在Fontan修复患者和志愿者之间表现出显着差异(??? 16.49?±5.00 vs. -19.49?±2.03; p?= 0.002)。 2D GRS和2D GCS在两组之间没有显着差异。 2D GRS:38.96?±14.48与37.46?±7.77; 2D GCS:?? 17.64?±5.00与-16.89?±2.96分别; p?> 0.05)。 3D全局径向应变(GRS),全局圆周应变(GCS)和全局纵向应变(GLS)在Fontan修复患者和志愿者之间存在显着差异(3D GRS:36.35?±16.72与44.96?±9.98; 3D GLS:?? 8.86?±6.84与-13.67?±2.44; 3D GCS:?? 13.70?±18.01?±1.78; p?<?0.05分别)。喷射分数(EF)和3D GCs显着相关(R?= ??? 0.491,p?= 0.004)。 3D GCS显示与索引结束 - 舒张体积(EDV)的相关性(R?= 0.523,P?= 0.002)和索引的末端收缩量(ESV)(R?= 0.602,P?<0.001) 。 3D应变显示出良好的再现性,GCS显示出最佳观察者间协议(ICC?=?= 0.87和COV?=?5.15),其次是GLS(ICC?= 0.84和COV?=?5.36)。 3D GCS是可行的,高度可重复的,与传统的心功能措施强烈相关。 3D GCS评估可用于监测Fontan循环患者的异常心肌运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号