首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Evaluation Methods for Assessing Users’ Psychological Experiences of Web-Based Psychosocial Interventions: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Evaluation Methods for Assessing Users’ Psychological Experiences of Web-Based Psychosocial Interventions: A Systematic Review

机译:评估用户心理社会干预措施的心理经历的评估方法:系统审查

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The use of Web-based interventions to deliver mental health and behavior change programs is increasingly popular. They are cost-effective, accessible, and generally effective. Often these interventions concern psychologically sensitive and challenging issues, such as depression or anxiety. The process by which a person receives and experiences therapy is important to understanding therapeutic process and outcomes. While the experience of the patient or client in traditional face-to-face therapy has been evaluated in a number of ways, there appeared to be a gap in the evaluation of patient experiences of therapeutic interventions delivered online. Evaluation of Web-based artifacts has focused either on evaluation of experience from a computer Web-design perspective through usability testing or on evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Neither of these methods focuses on the psychological experience of the person while engaged in the therapeutic process.Objective: This study aimed to investigate what methods, if any, have been used to evaluate the in situ psychological experience of users of Web-based self-help psychosocial interventions.Methods: A systematic literature review was undertaken of interdisciplinary databases with a focus on health and computer sciences. Studies that met a predetermined search protocol were included.Results: Among 21 studies identified that examined psychological experience of the user, only 1 study collected user experience in situ. The most common method of understanding users’ experience was through semistructured interviews conducted posttreatment or questionnaires administrated at the end of an intervention session. The questionnaires were usually based on standardized tools used to assess user experience with traditional face-to-face treatment.Conclusions: There is a lack of methods specified in the literature to evaluate the interface between Web-based mental health or behavior change artifacts and users. Main limitations in the research were the nascency of the topic and cross-disciplinary nature of the field. There is a need to develop and deliver methods of understanding users’ psychological experiences while using an intervention.
机译:背景:使用基于网络的干预措施来提供心理健康和行为变更计划越来越受欢迎。它们具有成本效益,可访问,并且通常有效。这些干预措施往往涉及心理敏感和挑战性问题,如抑郁或焦虑。人员收到和经验治疗的过程对于了解治疗过程和结果非常重要。虽然在传统面对面治疗中的患者或客户的经验已经以许多方式进行评估,但在在线交付的治疗干预患者的评估中似乎存在差距。通过可用性测试或对治疗效果评估,对基于网络的工件的评估重点是从计算机网络设计视角的经验评估。这些方法都没有侧重于从事治疗过程的人的心理经验。目的:这项研究旨在调查哪些方法,如果有的话,如果已被用于评估基于网络自我用户的用户的原位心理经验帮助心理社会干预措施。方法:系统的文献综述是跨学科数据库的,重点是健康和计算机科学。包括符合预定搜索协议的研究。结果:在21项研究中确定了检查用户的心理经验,只有1学习收集用户体验。最常见的理解用户经验的方法是通过半系统面试进行后处理或调查问卷在干预课程结束时。调查问卷通常基于标准化的工具,用于评估传统面对面治疗的用户体验。结论:文献中缺乏指定的方法来评估基于Web的心理健康或行为之间的界面改变工件和用户。研究中的主要局限性是该主题和跨学科性质的纳粹状。有必要在使用干预时开发和提供理解用户的心理体验的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号