...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG reveals the dynamics of human object processing
【24h】

Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG reveals the dynamics of human object processing

机译:MEG和EEG的多元模式分析揭示了人类物体处理的动力学

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Despite the increasing popularity of multivariate pattern classification methods for electrophysiological data, little is known about the decoding performance of MEG vs. EEG data. The two modalities measure electromagnetic signals from the same underlying neural sources, yet they have systematic differences in sampling neural activity. Here, we investigated the extent to which such measurement differences consistently bias the information coded in MEG and EEG signals in human visual object recognition. We conducted a concurrent MEG/EEG study while participants (N=15) viewed images of 92 everyday objects and compared MEG/EEG multivariate results in both time and space. Comparison in time relied on evaluating classification time courses directly, and via representational similarity analysis (RSA). Comparison in space relied on fusion of MEG/EEG data with fMRI data based on RSA. This enabled direct localization of MEG/EEG signals with independent fMRI data, bypassing the inherent ambiguities of inverse solutions. Single image classification revealed increased MEG sensitivity to early components (peak at 112ms, 95% CI: 109-124ms), versus increased EEG sensitivity to late components (peak at 181ms; 131-195ms). Despite such bias, categorical information (animate vs. inanimate; faces vs. bodies; and others) was mostly equivalent between the two modalities. Fusion with fMRI also revealed comparable spatiotemporal dynamics for MEG and EEG. However, investigation of V1 and IT revealed unexpected results: while the two modalities equivalently matched fMRI data in V1, MEG was more similar to fMRI in IT than EEG, despite the increased sensitivity of EEG to late components. Overall, we found EEG and MEG were sensitive to partly common and partly unique aspects of visual representations. Together, our results offer a novel comparison of MEG and EEG signals in representational space, and motivate the wider adoption of multivariate analysis methods in both MEG and EEG.
机译:尽管用于电生理数据的多元模式分类方法日益普及,但对于MEG与EEG数据的解码性能知之甚少。两种方式可测量来自相同基础神经源的电磁信号,但它们在采样神经活动方面存在系统差异。在这里,我们研究了这种测量差异在多大程度上持续偏向人类视觉目标识别中以MEG和EEG信号编码的信息。我们进行了一项同时进行的MEG / EEG研究,参与者(N = 15)查看了92个日常物体的图像,并比较了时间和空间上的MEG / EEG多元结果。时间上的比较依赖于直接评估分类时间课程,并通过代表性相似性分析(RSA)。空间上的比较依赖于基于RSA的MEG / EEG数据与fMRI数据的融合。这样就可以通过独立的fMRI数据直接定位MEG / EEG信号,从而避免了逆解的固有歧义。单一图像分类显示,MEG对早期成分的敏感度增加(峰值为112ms,95%CI:109-124ms),而EEG对晚期成分的敏感度增加(峰值为181ms; 131-195ms)。尽管存在这种偏见,但两种方式之间的分类信息(有生命与无生命;面部与身体;以及其他)大致相同。与fMRI融合还显示了MEG和EEG的时空动态相当。但是,对V1和IT的调查显示出了出乎意料的结果:尽管这两种方式在V1中与fMRI数据等效匹配,但尽管EEG对后期成分的敏感性有所提高,但MEG在IT中比fMRI更像是EEG。总体而言,我们发现EEG和MEG对视觉表示的部分常见和部分独特的方面很敏感。在一起,我们的结果提供了代表空间中MEG和EEG信号的新颖比较,并激发了多元分析方法在MEG和EEG中的广泛采用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号