首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Gains and Losses: Is Figure Ground Perception Influenced by Motivation or Learned Value?
【24h】

Gains and Losses: Is Figure Ground Perception Influenced by Motivation or Learned Value?

机译:得与失:图的地面感知是否受到动机或学习价值的影响?

获取原文
           

摘要

Can learned value influence figure-ground perception? Participants learned to associate probabilistic gains and losses with novel shapes. Shapes were presented in fixed pairs: two win pairs, two loss pairs, and two control pairs. Within win and loss pairs, one shape had a p(80%) value (win: +10?¢; loss: -10?¢) the other had a p(20%) value. The complement of the p(80%)-shape in one win(loss) pair was the p(20%)-shape in the other win(loss) pair. Subjects learned to maximize their earnings by choosing the p(80%)-win shape and the p(20%)-loss shape. Next, participants reported on perceived figure-ground organization of bipartite displays in which an 80% win(loss) shape competed for figural status with a 20% shape in the same win(loss) condition. If learned value influences figure assignment, the relatively high-value shape should be seen as the figure (80% win shape, 20% loss shape). Instead, participants were more likely to perceive the low-value shape as figure, evident across eight repetitions of figure-ground displays in the win condition (57%, p .04), but only four repetitions in the loss condition (58%, p .02). Thus, the expected effect of value was not observed: When a low-value shape competed for figural status with a high-value shape, the low-value shape won. This is the shape participants were motivated to avoid [p(-10?¢)=80% in loss pairs and p(+10?¢)=20% in win pairs]. The high-value shape that participants were motivated to choose during learning (because it maximized earnings) lost the competition for figure assignment. Our results are the first to show that motivation, particularly motivation to avoid, influences figure assignment. Why does motivation to avoid rather than motivation to choose influence figure assignment? The decision-making literature shows that losses loom greater than gains; our results are consistent with that human tendency provided that we consider a low p(gain) a loss relative to a high p(gain).
机译:学习的价值会影响图形背景的感知吗?参与者学会了将概率的得失与新颖的形状联系起来。形状以固定对的形式呈现:两个获胜对,两个损失对和两个控制对。在获胜和损失对中,一个形状具有p(80%)值(胜利:+10?¢;损失:-10?¢),另一个形状具有p(20%)值。一对胜利(亏损)对中的p(80%)形状的补码是另一对胜利(亏损)对中的p(20%)形状。受试者学会了通过选择p(80%)获胜的形状和p(20%)亏损的形状来最大化自己的收入。接下来,参与者报告了感知到的两方显示器的图形-背景组织,其中80%的获胜(损失)形状在相同的获胜(损失)条件下与20%的形状竞争形象状态。如果学习价值影响图形分配,则应将较高价值的图形视为图形(80%获胜形状,20%亏损形状)。取而代之的是,参与者更有可能将低值形状视为数字,这在获胜条件下的八次重复图形背景显示中很明显(57%,p <.04),而在损失情况下只有四次重复(58%) ,p <.02)。因此,没有观察到价值的预期效果:当低值形状与高值形状竞争形象状态时,低值形状获胜。这是参与者避免[P(-10?¢)= 80%的损失对和p(+10?¢)= 20%的胜利对]的动机。参与者在学习过程中被激励选择的高价值形状(因为它最大化了收益)使人们失去了分配人物的竞争。我们的结果首次表明动机,尤其是避免动机会影响人物分配。为什么要避免动机而不是选择影响力人物分配动机?决策文献表明,损失大于收益。我们的结果与人类的趋势是一致的,前提是我们认为相对于高p(增益)而言,低p(增益)是损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号