...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Is the attentional boost effect really a boost?
【24h】

Is the attentional boost effect really a boost?

机译:注意提升效果真的可以提升吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

When performing two tasks at once, increasing attention to one task typically impairs performance of the other. In contrast, the attentional boost effect suggests that dual-task facilitation can also sometimes occur: Memory for images that coincide with an unrelated stimulus that requires a response (target) is better than memory for images that coincide with a stimulus that requires no response (distractor). This performance advantage reflects a difference in memory for images presented with targets relative to those presented with distractors. As a result, it could reflect either an enhancement triggered by target detection or inhibitory processes triggered by distractor rejection. To determine whether the attentional boost effect is truly a boost, a baseline measure of image memory under dual-task encoding conditions is necessary. In several experiments participants memorized a series of continuously presented faces while monitoring a second series of unrelated squares. The face could appear in three different encoding conditions: on its own, with a square that required a response (target), or with a square that required no response (distractor). Processes associated with both target detection and distractor rejection were minimized when faces appeared on their own, making this condition suitable as a baseline measure of face encoding. Consistent with the claim that the attentional boost effect is triggered by target detection, the data showed that memory for faces coinciding with a target square was enhanced relative to faces in both the baseline and distractor conditions. There was no evidence of a difference in memory for faces in the baseline and distractor conditions. We conclude that detecting a behaviorally relevant event boosts memory for concurrently presented images in dual-task situations.
机译:当一次执行两项任务时,增加对一项任务的关注通常会削弱另一项任务的性能。相比之下,注意力增强效应表明有时也会出现双重任务促进:与需要响应(目标)的无关刺激相吻合的图像的记忆比与不需要响应的刺激相一致的图像的记忆(分心器)。这种性能优势反映了目标显示的图像相对于分散器显示的图像在内存上的差异。结果,它可能反映了目标检测触发的增强或干扰物排斥触发的抑制过程。为了确定注意力增强效果是否确实是增强效果,必须在双任务编码条件下对图像内存进行基线测量。在几个实验中,参与者记住了一系列连续呈现的面孔,同时监视了第二系列无关的正方形。脸部可能会以三种不同的编码条件出现:单独出现,需要响应的方块(目标)或不需要响应的方块(干扰物)。当人脸独立出现时,与目标检测和干扰物排斥相关的过程被最小化,使这种情况适合作为人脸编码的基线测量。与通过目标检测触发注意力增强效果的说法一致,数据表明,与目标方格一致的人脸的记忆相对于基线和干扰条件下的人脸都得到了增强。没有证据表明在基线状态和牵张状态下面部记忆的差异。我们得出的结论是,在双任务情况下,检测行为相关事件会增加同时显示的图像的内存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号