首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Sacroiliac Joint Mobilisation versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pregnancy Induced Posterior Pelvic Pain- A Randomised Clinical Trial
【24h】

Sacroiliac Joint Mobilisation versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pregnancy Induced Posterior Pelvic Pain- A Randomised Clinical Trial

机译:cro关节动员与经皮神经电刺激治疗妊娠后盆腔痛-一项随机临床试验

获取原文
       

摘要

The prevalence of back pain in pregnancy is reported to be 75% especially in the last trimester, 20% of these report posterior pelvic pain.Aim: To compare the effect of Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) mobilisation and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on pain and functional status in individuals with pregnancy induced posterior pelvic pain.Materials and Methods: A single blinded randomised clinical trial was conducted at Department of Physiotherapy, KM Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, Gujarat, India. A total of 30 pregnant participants of 20 to 35 years with uncomplicated pregnancy and positive FABER?S (Patrick?s) test were selected and randomly assigned into two groups. SIJ mobilisation and TENS was given to Group A and Group B respectively thrice a week for five sessions. Both the groups received lumbo-pelvic stabilisation exercises, activity modification and ergonomic advises. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment and Roland Morris disability score was used to find impact on functional status. Baseline assessment was noted for pain and functional disability. Data were collected immediately after first intervention and at the end of five sessions.Results: Both the outcome measures in intragroup analysis showed improvements. Mean change in VAS score after five sessions for Group A was 6.91 and for Group B was 4.91. Functional improvement as assessed by RMDQ was 91% for Group A and 89% for Group B. Intergroup analysis proved that SIJ mobilisation was more effective in reducing pain and improving functional status (p<0.05).Conclusion: SIJ mobilisation and TENS are effective in treating pregnancy induced posterior pelvic pain and reducing associated disability. SIJ mobilisation is more effective in terms of improvement.
机译:据报道,怀孕期间背痛的患病率为75%,尤其是在最后三个月,其中20%报道了骨盆后疼痛。目的:比较Sa关节(SIJ)动员和经皮电神经刺激( (b)材料和方法:在古吉拉特邦卡拉姆萨德的Shree Krishna医院KM Patel物理疗法研究所物理治疗部进行了一项单盲随机临床试验,该试验涉及妊娠引起的后盆腔痛患者的疼痛和功能状态。印度。总共选择了30名20至35岁,无并发症妊娠且FABER?S(Patrick?s)阳性的孕妇,将其随机分为两组。 A组和B组分别每周三次进行SIJ动员和TENS,共五次。两组均接受腰椎骨盆稳定练习,活动修改和人体工程学建议。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行疼痛评估,并使用Roland Morris残疾评分来评估对功能状态的影响。基线评估指出疼痛和功能障碍。首次干预后和五个疗程结束时立即收集数据。结果:组内分析的两种结果指标均显示出改善。 A组经过5个疗程后,VAS评分的平均变化为6.91,B组为4.91。 RMDQ评估的功能改善A组为91%,B组为89%。小组间分析证明,SIJ动员在减轻疼痛和改善功能状态方面更为有效(p <0.05)。结论:SIJ动员和TENS可有效治疗妊娠引起的后盆腔疼痛并减少相关的残疾。 SIJ动员在改善方面更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号