首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial
【24h】

Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial

机译:经发性过度活性膀胱综合征的儿童短期内,经皮胫骨神经刺激(TTN)与假治疗(第I部分)和TTNS与经皮胫骨神经刺激(PTNS)(第II部分)的临床疗效(第I部分)(第II部分): 双蒙上双盲随机受控塔帕纤维藜试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a pediatric population. To our knowledge, both therapies never have been compared in children. The aim of the complete study is twofold: (1) to assess the efficacy of TTNS therapy on bladder symptoms after 12?weeks of treatment in a pediatric population with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (iOAB) and/or nocturnal enuresis (part I) and (2) to assess the effect of TTNS compared to PTNS (part II). In this article, we aim to present the protocol of the first part of the TaPaS trial (TTNS, PTNS, sham therapy). Part I of the TaPaS trial is set up as a single-center randomized-controlled trial. Children, aged from 5 to 12?years with iOAB and/or nocturnal enuresis, are assigned to two groups by computer-generated randomization: TTNS therapy (intervention) and sham therapy (control). The primary outcome is the percentage difference in average voided volume (AVV) between baseline and after 12?weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are the percentage difference in supervoid volumes, number of urinary incontinence episodes/24?h and in voiding frequency, the difference in parent reported outcomes between baseline and after 12?weeks of treatment, and the duration of clinical response. We hypothesize that TTNS is a non-inferior treatment for iOAB in children compared to PTNS therapy. Since literature is inconclusive about the efficacy of TTNS in a pediatric population, a sham-controlled RCT on TTNS will be conducted (part I). A protocol for a prospective randomized sham-controlled trial has been developed. Enrolment has started in November 2018. Study completion of part I is expected by August 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 04256876 . Retrospectively registered on February 5, 2020.
机译:经皮胫骨神经刺激(TTN)和经皮胫骨神经刺激(PTNS)是有效且安全的成人过度活性膀胱(OAB)综合征的疗法。然而,很少有随机的假控制试验已经在儿科人群中进行。据我们所知,两个疗法在儿童中都没有比较。完整研究的目的是双重的:(1)评估TTNS治疗TTNS治疗在12次治疗患者中的膀胱症状对具有特发性过度活性膀胱综合征(IOAB)和/或夜间遗尿(第I部分)和/或I)和(2)评估TTN与PTN(第二部分)的影响。在本文中,我们的目标是介绍Tapas试验的第一部分(TTN,PTN,假治疗)的协议。 Tapas试验的第I部分被设置为单中心随机对照试验。使用IOAb和/或夜间遗尿的儿童5至12岁,通过计算机生成的随机化分配给两组:TTNS治疗(干预)和假治疗(控制)。主要结果是基线之间平均空隙体积(AVV)的百分比差异,并在12周内治疗。次要终点是监控体积的百分比,尿失禁次数剧集/ 24?H以及排尿频率,父母的差异报告基线之间的结果和12个周的治疗后,以及临床反应的持续时间。我们假设TTN是与PTNS治疗相比儿童IOAB的非劣疫性治疗。由于文献术语不确定TTN在儿科人群中的功效,因此将进行TTN上的假控RCT(第一部分)。已经开发了一种用于预期随机的假手性试验的协议。入学人士于2018年11月开始。研究所的研究完成,预计将在2021年8月2011年.Clinicaltrial.gov NCT 04256876。 2020年2月5日回顾性地注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号