首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Biodentine as Dentin Substitutes to Bonded Silver Amalgam and Composite Resin
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Biodentine as Dentin Substitutes to Bonded Silver Amalgam and Composite Resin

机译:树脂改性玻璃离聚物水泥和生物素作为牙本质替代键合银汞合金和复合树脂的剪切粘结强度的比较评估

获取原文
           

摘要

The bond strength between the restorative material and the tooth, as well as between the restorative material and the base, is an important factor and can determine the longevity of a dental treatment.Aim: Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of Resin modified glass ionomer cement and Biodentine as dentin substitutes to Bonded silver amalgam and Composite resin.Materials and Methods: Acrylic resin blocks of dimension 3x1.5x1.5 cm were made. A total of 40 acrylic blocks containing a central hole (wells) with 4 mm diameter and a 2 mm height were prepared. The samples were randomly divided into two groups- Group 1 and Group 2 having 20 samples each. The wells of Group 1 and Group 2 were filled with Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) and Biodentine, respectively according to manufacturer?s instructions. The samples of each group were further divided into four subgroups (n=10): Group 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B. The surface of Group1A and 2A were etched and then treated with adhesive (Adper single bond-2, 3M ESPE) and restored with nanohybrid composite resin and specimens of 1B and 2B were etched and treated with adhesive (Meta P & Bond- MetaBiomed) respectively and were restored with silver amalgam. All the samples were stored in artificial saliva for 24 hours at 37.5°C, 100% humidity and were subjected to shear bond strength testing.Results: Group 1A (RMGIC + Composite) showed the highest shear bond strength values-29.58 MPa followed by Group 2A (Biodentine + Composite resin) - 5.59 MPa, Group 1B (RMGIC + Bonded silver amalgam) - 3.96 MPa and least was seen in Group 2B (Biodentine + Bonded silver amalgam) - 0.445 MPa.Conclusion: This study concluded that combination of Composite resin and RMGIC or Composite resin and Biodentine showed higher shear bond strength values as compared to a combination of RMGIC and Bonded silver amalgam or Biodentine and Bonded silver amalgam.
机译:修复材料与牙齿之间以及修复材料与基体之间的粘结强度是一个重要因素,可以决定牙科治疗的寿命。目标:树脂改性的剪切粘结强度的比较评估玻璃离聚物水泥和Biodentine作为牙本质替代银键汞齐和复合树脂的方法。材料和方法:制备尺寸为3x1.5x1.5 cm的丙烯酸树脂块。总共准备了40个丙烯酸树脂块,其中包含一个直径为4毫米,高度为2毫米的中心孔(孔)。样品被随机分为两组:第一组和第二组各有20个样品。根据制造商的说明,分别在第1组和第2组的孔中填充树脂改性玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC)和Biodentine。每组的样品进一步分为四个亚组(n = 10):1A,1B,2A,2B组。刻蚀掉Group1A和2A的表面,然后用粘合剂(Adper single bond-2,3M ESPE)进行处理,并用纳米混合复合树脂进行修复,分别刻蚀1B和2B的样品并用粘合剂(Meta P和Bond- MetaBiomed)进行处理。并用银汞合金修复。所有样品均在37.5°C,100%湿度下在人造唾液中保存24小时,并进行剪切粘合强度测试。结果:1​​A组(RMGIC +复合材料)显示出最高的剪切粘合强度值-29.58 MPa其次是2A组(Biodentine +复合树脂)-5.59 MPa,1B组(RMGIC +粘结银汞合金)-3.96 MPa,在2B组(Biodentine +粘结银汞合金)-0.445 MPa中观察到最少。结论:研究得出的结论是,与RMGIC和键合银汞合金或Biodentine和键合银汞合金的组合相比,复合树脂和RMGIC或复合树脂和Biodentine的组合显示出更高的剪切粘结强度值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号