首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques >Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite to resin-modified glass-ionomer cement using three different resin adhesives vs. glass-ionomer based adhesive
【24h】

Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite to resin-modified glass-ionomer cement using three different resin adhesives vs. glass-ionomer based adhesive

机译:与三种基于玻璃离聚物的粘合剂相比,使用三种不同树脂粘合剂的树脂复合材料与树脂改性的玻璃离聚物水泥的剪切粘结强度评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The clinical success of sandwich technique depends on the strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) bonding to both dentin and resin composite. Therefore, the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin composite bonded to RMGIC utilizing different resin adhesives versus a GIC-based adhesive was compared. Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, 84 holes (5×2 mm) were prepared in acrylic blocks, randomly divided into seven groups (n=12) and filled with RMGIC (Light-Cured Universal Restorative, GC). In the Group I; no adhesive was applied on the RMGIC. In the Group II, non-etched and Group III was etched with phosphoric acid. In groups II and III, after rinsing, etch-and-rinse adhesive (OptiBond Solo Plus); in the Group IV; a two-step self-etch adhesive (OptiBond XTR) and in Group V; a one-step self-etch (OptiBond All-in-One) were applied on the cement surfaces. Group VI; a GIC-based adhesive (Fuji Bond LC) was painted over the cement surface and cured. Group VII; the GIC-based adhesive was brushed over RMGIC followed by the placement of resin composite and co-cured. Afterward; resin composite (Point 4) cylinders were placed on the treated cement surfaces. The specimens were placed in 100% humidity at 37 ± 1°C and thermo cycled. The shear bond test was performed at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min and calculated in MPa; the specimens were examined to determine mode of failure. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Results: The maximum (24.62±3.70 MPa) and minimum (18.15±3.38 MPa) SBS mean values were recorded for OptiBond XTR adhesive and the control group, respectively. The pairwise comparisons showed no significant differences between the groups that bonded with different adhesives. The adhesive failure was the most common failure mode observed. Conclusion: This study suggests that GIC-based adhesive could be applied over RMGIC as co-cure technique for sandwich restorations in lieu of employing the resin adhesives
机译:背景:三明治技术的临床成功取决于树脂改性的玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC)与牙本质和树脂复合材料的结合强度。因此,比较了使用与GIC基胶粘剂不同的树脂胶粘剂粘结到RMGIC上的树脂复合材料的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。材料和方法:在这项体外研究中,在丙烯酸树脂块中制备了84个孔(5×2毫米),随机分为7组(n = 12),并填充了RMGIC(光固化通用修复剂,GC)。在第一组中;没有在RMGIC上施加粘合剂。在第二组中,未蚀刻的和第三组是用磷酸蚀刻的。在第二组和第三组中,漂洗后使用蚀刻漂洗粘合剂(OptiBond Solo Plus);在第四组中; V组中的两步自蚀刻粘合剂(OptiBond XTR);在水泥表面上进行一步自蚀刻(OptiBond All-in-One)。第六组将GIC基胶粘剂(Fuji Bond LC)涂在水泥表面并固化。第七组将GIC基胶粘剂涂在RMGIC上,然后放置树脂复合材料并共固化。之后;将树脂复合材料(第4点)圆柱体放置在已处理的水泥表面上。将样品置于37±1°C的100%湿度中并进行热循环。在1mm / min的十字头速度下进行剪切粘结试验,并以MPa计算。检查样本以确定破坏模式。使用单向方差分析和Tukey检验分析结果。结果:分别记录了OptiBond XTR粘合剂和对照组的最大(24.62±3.70 MPa)和最小(18.15±3.38 MPa)SBS平均值。成对比较显示,用不同粘合剂粘合的组之间无显着差异。粘合失败是观察到的最常见的失败模式。结论:这项研究表明,基于GIC的胶粘剂可以代替RMGIC用作三明治修复的共固化技术,代替使用树脂胶粘剂

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号