首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: An in vitro study
【24h】

Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: An in vitro study

机译:评估使用三种通用粘合剂粘合到三种不同内衬(TheraCal LC,Biodentine和树脂改性的玻璃离子聚合物)的树脂复合材料的剪切粘合强度:一项体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: To compare and evaluate the bonding ability of resin composite (RC) to three different liners: TheraCal LC? (TLC), a novel resin-modified (RM) calcium silicate cement, Biodentine? (BD), and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using an universal silane-containing adhesive and characterizing their failure modes. Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted intact human molars with occlusal cavity (6-mm diameter and 2-mm height) were mounted in acrylic blocks and divided into three groups of 10 samples each based on the liner used as Group A (TLC), Group B (BD), and Group C (RMGIC). Composite post of 3 mm diameter and 3 mm height was then bonded to each sample using universal adhesive. Shear bond strength (SBS) analysis was performed at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Results: No significant difference was observed between group A and group C ( P = 0.573) while group B showed the least bond strength values with a highly significant difference ( P = 0.000). The modes of failure were predominantly cohesive in Groups A and B (TLC and BD) while RMGIC showed mixed and adhesive failures. Conclusions: Hence, this present study concludes that the bond strength of composite resin to TLC and RMGIC was similar and significantly higher than that of BD following application of universal adhesive.
机译:目的:比较和评估树脂复合材料(RC)与三种不同衬管的粘合能力:TheraCal LC? (TLC),一种新型的树脂改性(RM)硅酸钙水泥,Biodentine? (BD)和使用通用含硅烷粘合剂的树脂改性玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC)并表征其破坏模式。材料和方法:将30个完整的具有咬合腔的提取的人类臼齿(直径6毫米,高度2毫米)安装在丙烯酸树脂块中,并根据用作A组(TLC)的衬里分为三组,每组10个样品B(BD)和C组(RMGIC)。然后使用通用粘合剂将直径3 mm,高度3 mm的复合材料桩粘结到每个样品上。剪切粘结强度(SBS)分析以1 mm / min的十字头速度进行。使用的统计分析:使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析,并使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本20进行事后检验。结果:A组和C组之间没有观察到显着差异(P = 0.573),而B组的粘结强度值最小,差异极显着(P = 0.000)。在A组和B组(TLC和BD)中,失效模式主要是内聚性,而RMGIC显示出混合和粘合失效。结论:因此,本研究得出的结论是,应用通用胶粘剂后,复合树脂与TLC和RMGIC的粘结强度相似,并且明显高于BD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号