首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Effectiveness of Progressive Resistance Strength Training Versus Traditional Balance Exercise in Improving Balance Among the Elderly - A Randomised Controlled Trial
【24h】

Effectiveness of Progressive Resistance Strength Training Versus Traditional Balance Exercise in Improving Balance Among the Elderly - A Randomised Controlled Trial

机译:渐进抵抗力量训练与传统平衡锻炼在改善老年人平衡中的有效性-一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction:Falls are important health issues among the elderly people. Most falls in elderly result from abnormal balance control mechanisms. Balance and muscle force generation are directly related, and are associated with age related muscular changes. Studies addressing fall prevention have focused on various group and individualised strength training. However, evidence on strengthening of key muscles necessary for maintaining balance and postural control is lacking.Objectives:To evaluate the effectiveness of individualised progressive resistance strength training (PRT) programme in improving balance for forward limits of stability in elderly with balance impairment, compared to traditional balance exercise (TBE), and combination of both (COMBI).Materials and Methods: This randomised controlled trial included three groups; 18 subjects in each aged = 65 years, from the elderly care centres of Mangalore city in Southern India (between June 2008 and December 2012). Block randomisation technique was used and allocation concealment was done using sequentially arranged sealed opaque envelopes. The TBE group received 8 component traditional balance exercise; 4 times a week for 6 months. The PRT group received resistance training for the key muscles of lower extremities, using DeLormes and Watkins protocol. The COMBI group received PRT and TBE alternately (2 days of PRT and 2 days of TBE per week). Functional reach test (FRT) was used for measurement of forward limits of stability. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 15.Results:For functional reach, PRT group had steady progression from baseline to 6 months (p<0.001). The TBE and COMBI groups showed considerable initial improvement; beyond 3 months, moderate improvement was seen. The changes in scores of FRT were significantly better for PRT than TBE.Conclusion:Individualised PRT intervention targeting the key muscles of lower limbs is more effective than TBE in improving forward limits of stability among non-frail elderly aged = 65 years.
机译:简介:秋季是老年人的重要健康问题。老年人跌倒的主要原因是平衡控制机制异常。平衡和肌肉力量的产生直接相关,并且与年龄相关的肌肉变化有关。预防跌倒的研究集中于各种小组训练和个性化力量训练。然而,缺乏维持平衡和姿势控制所必需的关键肌肉强化的证据。材料和方法:这项随机对照试验包括三组:传统的平衡运动(TBE)和两者的结合(COMBI)。来自印度南部芒格洛尔市老年护理中心的每名年龄= 65岁的18名受试者(2008年6月至2012年12月之间)。使用块随机化技术,并使用顺序排列的密封不透明信封进行分配隐藏。 TBE组接受了8个组成部分的传统平衡练习;每周4次,共6个月。 PRT组使用DeLormes和Watkins协议对下肢关键肌肉进行了阻力训练。 COMBI组交替接受PRT和TBE(每周2天PRT和2天TBE)。使用功能范围测试(FRT)来测量稳定性的前向极限。数据使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第15版进行分析。结果:就功能范围而言,PRT组从基线到6个月稳步进展(p <0.001)。 TBE和COMBI组显示出相当大的初步改进。超过3个月,观察到中度改善。结论:针对下肢关键肌肉的个体化PRT干预在改善65岁以上非体弱老年人的稳定向前极限方面比TBE更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号