...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Learning Sessions on Critical Appraisal of Randomised Clinical Trials: Student Feedback
【24h】

Learning Sessions on Critical Appraisal of Randomised Clinical Trials: Student Feedback

机译:关于随机临床试验评估的学习会议:学生反馈

获取原文

摘要

Context:Critical appraisal skills are essential for students to become rational prescribers. Evidence-based medicine requires the ability to appraise articles critically. Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal, mainly admits students from Nepal, India and Sri Lanka for the undergraduate medical (MBBS) course. Pharmacology is taught during the first four semesters. The department recently started learning sessions on the critical analysis of published randomised clinical trials for the third- and fourth-semester students.Aims: The study is aimed to obtain information on the student attitudes towards the sessions and note the association, if any, of the attitudes with demographic characteristics of the respondents.Settings and design: The study was conducted among the third- and fourth-semester basic science students of the institution. The design was a prospective questionnaire-based study.Methods: Basic demographic information about the respondents was collected, and the degree of agreement with a set of 16 statements was noted. The agreement was noted using a modified Likert-type scale. The total score was calculated for each respondent. The scores of some statements were reversed while calculating the total score. Statistical analysis: The median total score was compared among different subgroups of respondents. The level of statistical significance for all analyses was set at p < 0.05 using two-tailed comparisons.Results: A total of 116 students participated (overall response rate was 81.8%). Nepalese and Indians were the major nationalities. The median score (interquartile range) was 54 (50.5?56.5). No significant difference in scores was seen among different subgroups. The students were of the opinion that the sessions made them aware of the technique of critical analysis of a journal article.Conclusions: Student opinion about the sessions was positive. Lack of knowledge of statistics among the students was a limitation. A student elective on reading and writing science can be considered.
机译:背景:批判性评估技能对于学生成为理性的处方者至关重要。循证医学要求能够对文章进行严格评估。尼泊尔博克拉的Manipal医学学院主要招收来自尼泊尔,印度和斯里兰卡的学生参加本科医学(MBBS)课程。头四个学期教授药理学。该系最近开始学习有关已发表的针对第三和第四学期学生的随机临床试验的批判性分析的学习课程。目的:该研究旨在获取有关学生对课程的态度的信息,并注意与该课程的相关性。设置和设计:该研究是在该机构的第三和第四学期基础科学专业学生中进行的。该设计是一项基于调查表的前瞻性研究。方法:收集有关受访者的基本人口统计学信息,并记录与一组16条陈述的一致程度。使用改良的Likert型量表记录了该协议。计算每个受访者的总分。在计算总分时,某些陈述的分值会颠倒。统计分析:比较了不同亚组的受访者的总中位数。通过双尾比较,所有分析的统计学显着性水平设置为p <0.05。结果:共有116名学生参加了调查(总答复率为81.8%)。尼泊尔和印第安人是主要民族。中位数(四分位间距)为54(50.5?56.5)。在不同的亚组中,得分没有显着差异。学生认为这些会议使他们意识到对期刊文章进行批判性分析的技巧。结论:学生对会议的评价是积极的。学生缺乏统计知识是一个限制。可以考虑选修阅读和写作科学的学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号