Clinical trial comparing bacitracin with Strep-A-Chek for accuracy and turnaround time in the presumptive identification of Streptococcus pyogenes.

摘要

In a clinical trial, Strep-A-Chek (a 10-min chromogenic test) was compared with the bacitracin disk susceptibility test for accuracy and turnaround time in the presumptive identification of Streptococcus pyogenes. Among 461 isolates of beta-hemolytic streptococci (344 throat isolates and 117 isolates from other sites), 303 group A S. pyogenes isolates were found. The sensitivities of the Strep-A-Chek and bacitracin tests were high (96.4 and 100%, respectively), but the bacitracin test had a lower specificity (84.2%) than the Strep-A-Chek test (98.7%). The predictive values for positive and negative test results were 99.3 and 93.4%, respectively, for Strep-A-Chek and 92.4 and 100%, respectively, for bacitracin. Strep-A-Chek correctly identified all isolates upon repeat testing. All bacitracin tests were performed on subcultures of isolates from the primary plate. Strep-A-Chek testing was performed on colonies from the primary plate when isolated colonies were available. This shortened the turnaround time for Strep-A-Chek compared with bacitracin by at least 24 h on nearly one-half (45%) of the isolates. A peripheral finding of this study was that sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim blood agar offered no advantage over conventional blood agar with regard to the number of false-positive bacitracin tests obtained from each medium.