...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the antibacterial spectra of cephalexin and cefaclor with those of cephalothin and newer cephalosporins: reevaluation of the class representative concept of susceptibility testing.
【24h】

Comparison of the antibacterial spectra of cephalexin and cefaclor with those of cephalothin and newer cephalosporins: reevaluation of the class representative concept of susceptibility testing.

机译:头孢氨苄和头孢克洛与头孢硫菌素和较新的头孢菌素的抗菌谱的比较:对药敏试验的代表性代表概念的重新评估。

获取原文

摘要

The validity of the class representative concept for in vitro susceptibility testing of older cephalosporins was reevaluated. Two oral cephalosporins, cephalexin and cefaclor, were compared with the established cephalosporin class representative, cephalothin, by using reference microdilution minimal inhibitory concentrations of 528 isolates of a wide variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial pathogens. For each comparison, there were only 15 (2.8%) random major and very major interpretive discrepancies. Additional comparisons confirmed the need to test second-generation (cefamandole) and third-generation (cefotaxime) cephalosporins separately. These results provide reasonable assurance that the use of cephalothin as an in vitro predictor of qualitative bacterial susceptibility to these two oral cephalosporins remains an acceptable alternative to testing each antibiotic individually.
机译:重新评估了用于老年头孢菌素体外药敏试验的班级代表性概念的有效性。通过使用参考微量稀释的528种细菌分离株对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌病原菌的最小抑菌浓度,将两种口服头孢菌素cephalexin和头孢克洛与已确立的头孢菌素类代表cephalothin进行了比较。对于每个比较,只有15个(2.8%)随机主要和非常主要的解释性差异。其他比较确认需要分别测试第二代(头孢曼多尔)和第三代(头孢噻肟)头孢菌素。这些结果提供了合理的保证,即使用头孢菌素作为这两种口服头孢菌素定性细菌敏感性的体外预测指标仍然是单独测试每种抗生素的可接受选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号