首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of ViraPap, Southern hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction methods for human papillomavirus identification in an epidemiological investigation of cervical cancer.
【24h】

Comparison of ViraPap, Southern hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction methods for human papillomavirus identification in an epidemiological investigation of cervical cancer.

机译:比较ViraPap,Southern杂交和聚合酶链反应方法在宫颈癌的流行病学调查中鉴定人乳头瘤病毒。

获取原文

摘要

In order to provide a reliable diagnosis for the presence and type of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in a case-control study of cervical cancer in Colombia and Spain, 926 cervical scrapes from female subjects were examined by ViraPap (VP) and Southern hybridization (SH), and 510 of these (263 cases and 247 controls) were also tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the HPV L1 consensus primers. HPV DNA prevalence was much higher in cases than in controls by each of the three tests. There was complete agreement between the results of the three tests for 64.9% of the 510 specimens; 53.5% were negative and 11.4% were positive (regardless of type) by all tests. An additional 29.0% of the specimens were positive by PCR: 19.4% by PCR alone, 6.7% by PCR and VP, and 2.9% by PCR and SH. SH and/or VP gave positive results for 6.0% of the specimens for which the PCR finding was negative: 2.7% by SH alone, 2.5% by VP alone, and 0.8% by both VP and SH. When specimens which were positive by VP alone or only by SH at low-stringency conditions were excluded, PCR confirmed all but four specimens which were positive by other tests. The concordance between type-specific diagnosis by SH and PCR was 86% when HPVs were typed in both tests. HPV-16 accounted for over 80% of the typed HPVs in each test. The presence of blood in case specimens did not appear to inhibit HPV positivity by VP or by PCR at the dilution tested. Low amounts of cellular DNA of specimens resulted in some underestimation of HPV positivity by VP and SH but not by PCR. Compared with that of PCR, the sensitivities for case specimens were 38% by SH and 50% by VP; the sensitivity for control specimens, although it could not be measured precisely because there were few positive specimens, appeared to be lower than for case specimens. It was concluded that PCR-based tests are best suited for epidemiological investigation of HPVs.
机译:为了在哥伦比亚和西班牙的子宫颈癌病例对照研究中提供可靠的诊断,以诊断人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA的类型,通过ViraPap(VP)和Southern杂交对926名女性受试者的宫颈刮scrap进行了检查( SH),其中的510个(263例和247个对照)也使用HPV L1共有引物通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行了测试。在这三个测试中,HPV DNA的患病率均比对照组高得多。 510个样本中有64.9%的三个测试结果完全一致。所有测试的阴性率为53.5%,阳性率为11.4%(与类型无关)。 PCR阳性的样本占29.0%:单独PCR的样本占19.4%,PCR和VP的样本占6.7%,PCR和SH的样本占2.9%。 SH和/或VP对6.0%的PCR阴性的标本给出了阳性结果:单独使用SH的比例为2.7%,单独使用VP的比例为2.5%,单独使用VP和SH的比例为0.8%。当排除仅在低严格性条件下仅通过VP或仅通过SH呈阳性的标本时,PCR确认除4个在其他测试中呈阳性的标本。当在两个测试中都键入HPV时,通过SH和PCR进行的类型特异性诊断的一致性为86%。在每次测试中,HPV-16占键入的HPV的80%以上。如果在测试的稀释度下标本似乎没有通过VP或PCR抑制HPV阳性,则存在血液。标本的细胞DNA含量低导致VP和SH降低了HPV阳性率,但PCR却没有。与PCR相比,SH的敏感性为38%,VP的敏感性为50%。尽管由于阳性标本很少而无法精确测量对照标本的灵敏度,但其灵敏度似乎要低于案例标本。结论是基于PCR的测试最适合HPV的流行病学调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号