...
首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Ambulatory Pulse Wave Velocity Is a Stronger Predictor of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Than Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hemodialysis PatientsNovelty and Significance
【24h】

Ambulatory Pulse Wave Velocity Is a Stronger Predictor of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Than Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hemodialysis PatientsNovelty and Significance

机译:动态脉搏波速度是血液透析患者心血管事件和全因死亡率高于办公室和动态血压的更强预测指标

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Arterial stiffness and augmentation of aortic blood pressure (BP) measured in office are known cardiovascular risk factors in hemodialysis patients. This study examines the prognostic significance of ambulatory brachial BP, central BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and heart rate–adjusted augmentation index [AIx(75)] in this population. A total of 170 hemodialysis patients underwent 48-hour ambulatory monitoring with Mobil-O-Graph-NG during a standard interdialytic interval and followed-up for 28.1±11.2 months. The primary end point was a combination of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included: (1) all-cause mortality; (2) cardiovascular mortality; and (3) a combination of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure. During follow-up, 37(21.8%) patients died and 46(27.1%) had cardiovascular events. Cumulative freedom from primary end point was similar for quartiles of predialysis-systolic BP (SBP), 48-hour peripheral-SBP, and central-SBP, but was progressively longer for increasing quartiles for 48-hour peripheral-diastolic BP and central-diastolic BP and shorter for increasing quartiles of 48-hour central pulse pressure (83.7%, 71.4%, 69.0%, 62.8% [log-rank P=0.024]), PWV (93.0%, 81.0%, 57.1%, 55.8% [log-rank P0.001]), and AIx(75) (88.4%, 66.7%, 69.0%, 62.8% [log-rank P=0.014]). The hazard ratios for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and the combined outcome were similar for quartiles of predialysis-SBP, 48-hour peripheral-SBP, and central-SBP, but were increasing with higher ambulatory PWV and AIx(75). In multivariate analysis, 48-hour PWV was the only vascular parameter independently associated with the primary end point (hazard ratios, 1.579; 95% confidence intervals, 1.187–2.102). Ambulatory PWV, AIx(75), and central pulse pressure are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, whereas office and ambulatory SBP are not. These findings further support that arterial stiffness is the prominent cardiovascular risk factor in hemodialysis.
机译:在办公室测量的动脉僵硬度和主动脉血压(BP)升高是血液透析患者的已知心血管危险因素。这项研究检查了该人群中的非活动性臂丛BP,中枢BP,脉搏波速度(PWV)和心率调整后的增强指数[AIx(75)]的预后意义。在标准的透析间隔期间,总共170名血液透析患者接受了Mobil-O-Graph-NG的48小时动态监测,并随访了28.1±11.2个月。主要终点是全因死亡,非致命性心肌梗塞和非致命性中风的组合。次要终点包括:(1)全因死亡率; (2)心血管病死亡率; (3)心血管死亡,非致命性心肌梗塞,非致命性中风,心脏骤停后复苏,冠状动脉血运重建或心力衰竭住院的综合治疗。在随访期间,有37(21.8%)例患者死亡,有46(27.1%)例发生心血管事件。透析前收缩期血压(SBP),48小时外周血SBP和中枢性SBP的四分位数从主要终点的累积自由度相似,但对于48小时外周舒张血压和中枢舒张压的四分位数增加,逐渐增加对于48小时中心脉压增加四分位数的BP和更短(83.7%,71.4%,69.0%,62.8%[log-rank P = 0.024]),PWV(93.0%,81.0%,57.1%,55.8%[log -rank P <0.001])和AIx(75)(88.4%,66.7%,69.0%,62.8%[log-rank P = 0.014])。四分位数的透析前SBP,48小时外周血SBP和中枢血SBP的全因死亡率,心血管疾病死亡率和综合结局的危险比相似,但随着门诊PWV和AIx的升高而增加(75)。在多变量分析中,48小时PWV是唯一与主要终点独立相关的血管参数(危险比1.579; 95%置信区间1.187-2.102)。动态PWV,AIx(75)和中心脉压与心血管事件和死亡的风险增加相关,而办公室和动态SBP与之无关。这些发现进一步支持了动脉僵硬度是血液透析中重要的心血管危险因素。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号