首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan on Central Hemodynamics in the Elderly With Systolic HypertensionNovelty and Significance
【24h】

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan on Central Hemodynamics in the Elderly With Systolic HypertensionNovelty and Significance

机译:cu三醇/缬沙坦对奥美沙坦对收缩期高血压老年人中枢血流动力学的影响及其意义

获取原文
           

摘要

Effective treatment of systolic hypertension in elderly patients remains a major therapeutic challenge. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, was conducted to determine its effects versus olmesartan (angiotensin receptor blocker) on central aortic pressures, in elderly patients (aged ≥60 years) with systolic hypertension and pulse pressure 60 mm?Hg, indicative of arterial stiffness. Patients (n=454; mean age, 67.7 years; mean seated systolic blood pressure, 158.6 mm?Hg; mean seated pulse pressure, 69.7 mm?Hg) were randomized to receive once-daily sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg or olmesartan 20 mg, force titrated to double the initial doses after 4 weeks, before primary assessment at 12 weeks. The study extended double-blind treatment for 12 to 52 weeks, during which amlodipine (2.5–5 mg) and subsequently hydrochlorothiazide (6.25–25 mg) were added-on for patients not achieving blood pressure target (140/90). At week 12, sacubitril/valsartan reduced central aortic systolic pressure (primary assessment) greater than olmesartan by ?3.7 mm?Hg (P=0.010), further corroborated by secondary assessments at week 12 (central aortic pulse pressure, ?2.4 mm?Hg, P0.012; mean 24-hour ambulatory brachial systolic blood pressure and central aortic systolic pressure, ?4.1 mm?Hg and ?3.6 mm?Hg, respectively, both P0.001). Differences in 24-hour ambulatory pressures were pronounced during sleep. After 52 weeks, blood pressure parameters were similar between treatments (P0.002); however, more patients required add-on antihypertensive therapy with olmesartan (47%) versus sacubitril/valsartan (32%; P0.002). Both treatments were equally well tolerated. The PARAMETER study (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Measuring Arterial Stiffness in the Elderly), for the first time, demonstrated superiority of sacubitril/valsartan versus olmesartan in reducing clinic and ambulatory central aortic and brachial pressures in elderly patients with systolic hypertension and stiff arteries.
机译:在老年患者中有效治疗收缩期高血压仍然是主要的治疗挑战。进行了一项以头孢氨苄/缬沙坦(LCZ696)(一种一流的血管紧张素受体中性溶酶抑制剂)进行的多中心,双盲,随机对照试验,以确定其与奥美沙坦(血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)在老年患者中对中枢主动脉压的作用(年龄≥60岁),收缩期高血压,脉压> 60 mm?Hg,表明动脉僵硬。患者(n = 454;平均年龄:67.7岁;平均坐位收缩压:158.6 mm?Hg;平均坐位脉压:69.7 mm?Hg)被随机分配,接受每日一次沙必比尔/缬沙坦200 mg或奥美沙坦20 mg,在第4周后,第12周进行初次评估之前,力被滴定为初始剂量的两倍。该研究将双盲治疗延长了12至52周,在此期间,未达到血压目标(<140/90)的患者应加用氨氯地平(2.5-5 mg)和随后的氢氯噻嗪(6.25-25 mg)。在第12周时,沙库比特/缬沙坦使中心动脉主动脉收缩压(初步评估)比奥美沙坦降低了3.7 mm?Hg(P = 0.010),在第12周时进行了二次评估(中心主动脉搏动压力,?2.4 mm?Hg)进一步证实了这一点。 ,P <0.012;平均24小时门诊肱动脉收缩压和中心主动脉收缩压分别为?4.1 mm?Hg和?3.6 mm?Hg,两者均P <0.001)。睡眠期间24小时动态压力明显不同。 52周后,治疗之间的血压参数相似(P <0.002);然而,更多的患者需要奥美沙坦(47%)与沙比特利/缬沙坦(32%; P <0.002)的联合降压治疗。两种疗法的耐受性均相同。 PARAMETER研究(血管紧张素受体中性溶酶抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的前瞻性比较,可测量老年人的动脉刚度)首次证明了沙比特利/缬沙坦与奥美沙坦在降低老年患者门诊和门诊性主动脉和肱动脉压力方面的优势收缩期高血压和动脉僵硬。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号