首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Renal Nerve Stimulation鈥揑nduced Blood Pressure Changes Predict Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response After Renal DenervationNovelty and Significance
【24h】

Renal Nerve Stimulation鈥揑nduced Blood Pressure Changes Predict Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response After Renal DenervationNovelty and Significance

机译:肾神经刺激引起的血压变化预测肾去神经支配后动态血压的变化及其意义

获取原文
           

摘要

Blood pressure (BP) response to renal denervation (RDN) is highly variable and its effectiveness debated. A procedural end point for RDN may improve consistency of response. The objective of the current analysis was to look for the association between renal nerve stimulation (RNS)鈥搃nduced BP increase before and after RDN and changes in ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) after RDN. Fourteen patients with drug-resistant hypertension referred for RDN were included. RNS was performed under general anesthesia at 4 sites in the right and left renal arteries, both before and immediately after RDN. RNS-induced BP changes were monitored and correlated to changes in ambulatory BP at a follow-up of 3 to 6 months after RDN. RNS resulted in a systolic BP increase of 50卤27 mm鈥塇g before RDN and systolic BP increase of 13卤16 mm鈥塇g after RDN ( P <0.001). Average systolic ABPM was 153卤11 mm鈥塇g before RDN and decreased to 137卤10 mm鈥塇g at 3- to 6-month follow-up ( P =0.003). Changes in RNS-induced BP increase before versus immediately after RDN and changes in ABPM before versus 3 to 6 months after RDN were correlated, both for systolic BP ( R =0.77, P =0.001) and diastolic BP ( R =0.79, P =0.001). RNS-induced maximum BP increase before RDN had a correlation of R =0.61 ( P =0.020) for systolic and R =0.71 ( P =0.004) for diastolic ABPM changes. RNS-induced BP changes before versus after RDN were correlated with changes in 24-hour ABPM 3 to 6 months after RDN. RNS should be tested as an acute end point to assess the efficacy of RDN and predict BP response to RDN.# Novelty and Significance {#article-title-37}
机译:血压(BP)对肾神经支配(RDN)的反应变化很大,其有效性尚有争议。 RDN的过程终点可以提高响应的一致性。当前分析的目的是寻找肾神经刺激(RNS)引起的RDN前后血压升高与RDN后动态BP监测(ABPM)变化之间的关系。包括十四名接受RDN治疗的耐药性高血压患者。在RDN之前和之后,在右肾和左肾动脉的4个部位在全身麻醉下进行RNS。在RDN后3到6个月的随访中,监测RNS诱导的BP变化并将其与动态BP的变化相关。 RNS导致RDN前的收缩压增加50±27 mm mmg,而RDN后的收缩压增加13±16 mm Pg(P <0.001)。 RDN前的平均收缩压ABPM为153±11 mmg,在3至6个月的随访中降至137±10 mmg(P = 0.003)。收缩压(R = 0.77,P = 0.001)和舒张压(R = 0.79,P = 0.001)。在RDN之前,RNS引起的最大BP升高对于收缩压和舒张压ABPM变化具有R = 0.61(P = 0.020)和R = 0.71(P = 0.004)的相关性。 RDN前后RNS引起的BP变化与RDN后3至6个月的24小时ABPM变化相关。应该测试RNS作为评估RDN疗效并预测BP对RDN的反应的急性终点。#新奇和意义{#article-title-37}

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号